DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1), MANGALURU, MANGALURU vs. KARNATAKA BANK LTD., MANGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that no disallowance under Section 14A can be made in the case of banks, especially if the investments are considered stock-in-trade, following Supreme Court and jurisdictional High Court decisions.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a bank, had made disallowances under Section 14A. The Assessing Officer invoked Rule 8D and made a higher disallowance. The CIT(Appeals) partly allowed the appeal, deleting disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) but upholding disallowances under Rule 8D(2)(i) and (iii) to the extent of exempt income.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D is applicable to banks, particularly concerning investments that are stock-in-trade.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- South Indian Bank Ltd. v. CIT508 citing438 ITR 1 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
- Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. v. CIT326 citing343 ITR 270 · 2012 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Essar Tele198 citing401 ITR 445 · 2018 · SC
- PCIT v. PNB Housing Finance Ltd.6 citing157 Taxmann.com 465 · 2023 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K. & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
Per Bench These appeals are filed by the assessee & revenue against the separate orders 27.09.2023 of the CIT(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [NFAC], for the assessment years 2016-17 & 2017-18. 2. The assessee is a private sector bank carrying on the business of banking. The assessee filed return of income on 14.10.2016 for AY 2016-17 of Rs.280.37 crores and on 31.10.2017 for Rs.721.28 crores under
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026