THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals, finding the reasons cited by the assessee to be bonafide and sufficient. The Tribunal noted that there was no malafide intention and that the delay was caused by genuine difficulties and inability to act promptly.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a state-level co-operative agriculture and rural development bank, claimed deductions under Section 80P(2)(a)(i)/(d) on its interest income. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, holding that the assessee was engaged in banking business and hit by Section 80P(4). The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2) despite being considered a banking entity under Section 80P(4), and whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji3,926 citing167 ITR 471 · 1987 · SC
- Pr. CIT v. Totagars1,074 citing395 ITR 611 · 2017 · HC
- Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. v. ACIT499 citing397 ITR 1 · 2017 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, A BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI & SMT BEENA PILLAI
PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeals arise out of the following orders of the L.CIT(A) passed independently for Assessment Years 2012-13 to 2018-19 & 2020-21. The details of the impugned orders are as under: ITA Nos. 1052 to 1060/Bang/2023 Appeal No.
Assessment Year Impugned order dated 2012-13 29/05/2023 2013-14 11/05/2023 2013-14 11/05/2023 2014-15 11/05/2023 2015-16 16/
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- The Development Multipurpose Credit &… vs ITO Ward 2 (4), Porbandar, GujaratITA 458/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hislop College Employees Cooperative Credit… vs ITO Ward 2(3), NagpurITA 184/NAG/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026