RAMBALRAAM CHAINSS PRIVATE LIMITED,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1)(1), AGRA, AGRA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 315/AGR/2025Status: DisposedITAT Agra19 November 2025AY 2023-24Bench: SHRI M. BALAGANESH (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal in time. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the CITA to condone the delay, admit the appeal, and adjudicate the dispute afresh. The assessee was also granted liberty to raise additional grounds and furnish additional evidence.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a private limited company engaged in manufacturing gold ornaments, filed its return for AY 2023-24. The CPC processed the return and applied tax under section 115BAA instead of the eligible section 115BAB due to an inadvertent filing of Form 10 IC. This resulted in a tax demand. The appeal before the CITA was dismissed due to a 36-day delay.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee's income could be determined as per the concessional tax regime under section 115BAB and whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CITA should be condoned.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 115BAB,Section 143(1),Section 139(1),Section 115BAA,Section 234B,Section 234C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH “SMC”: AGRA

For Appellant: Shri S. C. Jain, CA
For Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR
Hearing: 16/09/2025Pronounced: 19/11/2025

AY 2023-24, arises out of the order of the ADD/JCIT(A), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. JCIT(A)’, in short] dated 05.03.2025 against the order of assessment passed u/s 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 22.12.2023 by the Assessing Officer, CPC, Bangalore (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’).

2.

The only effective issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the income of the assessee could be determined as per the new concessional tax regime provided under section 115BAB of the Act or not.

3.

I have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. The assessee is a private limited company engaged in the business of manufacturing gold chain ornaments (semi-finished). The assessee is eligible for the concessional tax regime under section 115BAB of the Act being a newly incorporated manufacturing company. The return of income for assessment year 2023-24 was filed by the assessee company on 29-9-2023 under section 139(1) of the Act. The learned CPC while processing the return issued an intimation under section 143(1) of the Act dated 22-12-2023 applying the tax rate under section 115BAA of the Act instead of section 115BAB of the Act. This error arose due to filing of Form 10 IC under section 115BAA of the Act on 10-2-2021 by the assessee due to inadvertence. The assessee however had duly rectified the same by filing the correct Form 10 ID under section 115BAB of the Act on 19-10- 2022. This had ultimately resulted in raising a tax demand on the assessee of Rs 98,450/- along with interest under section 234B and 234C of the Act by the learned CPC. When the matter was carried before the learned CITA with a delay of 36 days in preferring the appeal before the learned CITA, the learned CITA preferred not to condone the delay and dismissed the appeal of the assessee as not admitted. But I find that the assessee was prevented from sufficient cause from not preferring the appeal in time before the learned CITA. The affidavit of the managing director of the assessee company is already placed on record and hence we direct the learned CITA to condone the delay, admit the appeal of the assessee for adjudication and decide the dispute raised before him in accordance with law afresh. Needless to mention that the assessee be given reasonable opportunity of being heard. The assessee is at liberty to raise additional grounds, if any and furnish additional evidences, if any, in support of its contentions. With these directions, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes by restoring to the file of learned CITA.

4.

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 19/11/2025.

More judgments on Section 115BAB

All 46 judgments and leading authorities on Section 115BAB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →