THE TATA POWER CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT RG 2(3), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the disallowance under Section 14A, finding merit in the assessee's methodology which was accepted in prior years. Regarding transfer pricing adjustments, the Tribunal deleted additions concerning interest paid on technical know-how and foreign currency loans, accepting the assessee's effective rate of interest and LIBOR application for loans advanced from India.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in electricity generation, transmission, and distribution, entered into international transactions involving loans to an associated enterprise (AE) and provision of corporate guarantees. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) made significant adjustments to these transactions. The assessee also claimed expenditure on shelved projects and made a suo-moto disallowance under Section 14A.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the correctness of the disallowance made under Section 14A and the validity of transfer pricing adjustments made by the TPO on international transactions, particularly concerning interest rates on loans to associated enterprises.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Madras Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd. v. CIT568 citing225 ITR 802 · 1997 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Everest Kento Cylinders Ltd.304 citing58 Taxmann.com 254 · 2015 · HC
- CIT v. Vaibhav Gems Ltd.51 citing88 Taxmann.com 12 · 2017 · HC
- ACIT v. Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd.12 citing244 Taxmann 58 · 2016 · SC
- South Asia Tyres (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT3 citing53 Taxmann.com 169 · 2015
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “H”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY& MS. PADMAVATHY.S
PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the assessment order dated 30/11/2012 passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961[in short ‘the Act’], for the Assessment Year 2008-09. 2. The assessee is engaged in generation, transmission and distribution of electricity. During the period relevant to assessment year under appeal, the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026