SHAMDARSHAN PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 3(3)(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that unsold inventory of flats, which are stock-in-trade, cannot be assessed as 'Income from House Property'. Income arising from the sale of such stock-in-trade is taxable as business income.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a property developer, treated unsold flats as stock-in-trade. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated these unsold flats as deemed to be let out and taxed notional rental income under the head 'Income from House Property'. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's action.
What were the issues?
Whether notional rental income from unsold flats, treated as stock-in-trade, can be taxed under the head 'Income from House Property'.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Chennai Properties & Investments Ltd. v. CIT381 citing373 ITR 673 · 2015 · SC
- CIT v. Ansal Housing Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd.208 citing354 ITR 180 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE - JM: These two appeals are filed by the assessee against the separate orders of National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC) Delhi/CIT(A passed under section 143(3) and U/sec 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act). ITA No. 2779 & 2777/Mum/2023 AY 2012-13 & 2014-15 M/s Shamdarshan Properties pvt. LTd
Since the issues in these two appeals are similar and identical, hence are clubbed, heard and a consolidated order passed. For the sake of convenience,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 22
- Ramani Brothers, Ahmedabad vs The Dy.C.I.T. Circle-3(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2444/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Anurag Konduru, Bangalore vs DCIT, Circle-2(2)(1), BangaloreITA 2845/BANG/2025[2023-24]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Sree Sree Annapurna Devi Thakurani and… vs ITO, Ward 29(1), KolkataITA 1710/KOL/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2020-2021
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Genext Hardware and Parks Private Limited…ITA 6208/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2017-18
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Sheth Developers Private Limited, MumbaiITA 6204/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026