SREE SREE ANNAPURNA DEVI THAKURANI AND OTHERS,,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 29(1), KOLKATA,, KOLKATA
What were the facts?
The assessee, a private trust formed in 1937 for worshipping deities, did not initially file its return. The Assessing Officer disallowed puja expenses of Rs. 10,81,755/-, treating the trust as an AOP and the expenses as personal. The CIT(A) confirmed this disallowance due to lack of documentary evidence.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A), directing the AO to recompute the income after considering the trust deed, past history, and nature of expenses. The Tribunal also directed the AO to consider the claim for statutory deductions on rental income.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of puja expenses was justified without considering the trust deed and its purpose, and whether statutory deductions for rental income should be allowed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 250,Section 139(1),Section 142(1),Section 148A,Section 12A,Section 12AA,Section 22,Section 23,Section 244A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘SMC’ BENCH AT KOLKATA
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR US & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as Ld. 'CIT(A)'] passed u/s 250 of the Act for AY 2020-21 dated 20.03.2026. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal:
"
That the Order in Appeal passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is unwarranted, unlawful and against natural justice.
That the disallowance
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 638/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Kishorbhai C Bhagtani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 999/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Malhar Nitin Bhuptani, Rajkotq vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1054/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajlaxmi Agro Food Product Private Limited And Anr. vs. The Superint., CGST And Cx, Berhampore Range, Berhampore Division, Bolpur Commiss. And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shibsankar Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Alkem Laboratories Limited vs. Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise, RaigadBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Axis Bank LTD vs. State Of Maharashtra Thru. G P And AnrBombay · 6 Oct 2026