ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. C.L. SHARMA, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3954/DEL/2012Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 February 2017AY 2006-072 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the appeal was filed in violation of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, which sets a pecuniary limit of Rs. 10 lakh for filing appeals before the ITAT. The circular was made applicable retrospectively.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT for the assessment year 2006-07. The tax effect in the appeal was below Rs. 10 lakh.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable when the tax effect is below the prescribed pecuniary limit set by CBDT circulars, and if such circulars are binding on the authorities.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 268A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘B’ NEW DELHI

Before: SMT DIVA SINGH & SH.O.P.KANT

Hearing: 14.12.2016Pronounced: 15.02.2017

ORDER

PER DIVA SINGH, JM

1.

The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue assailing the correctness of the order dated 08.05.2012 of CIT(A)-III, Delhi pertaining to 2006-07 assessment year.

2.

It was a common stand of the parties before the Bench that the tax effect in the present appeal is well below Rs.10 lakh. We have considered the material available on record. We find that the appeal has been preferred by the Revenue in violation of Circular No.21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015 of CBDT. By the aforesaid circular, the pecuniary limit for filing the appeal before the ITAT has been prescribed beyond Rs.10 lakh. Para 3 of the aforesaid Circular has been made applicable vide para 10 retrospectively. Considering the settled legal precedent that the Board’s instructions or directions issued to the Income Tax Authorities u/s 268A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are binding on the authorities, we hold that the appeal is non-maintainable.

I.T.A .No.-3954/Del/2012 ACIT vs C.L.SHARMA

3.

In view of the above discussion, the present appeal preferred by the Revenue in violation of CBDT Circular No.21/2015 (cited supra) is not maintainable and hence, the same is dismissed as such making it clear that since the present appeal has not been disposed of on merits, but due to the above reason, this order will not have any judicial precedence. Accordingly, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as non-maintainable.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. The order is pronounced in the open court on 15th February, 2017.

More judgments on Section 268A

All 3,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 268A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →