DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, DELHI vs. LOTUS HERBALS PVT. LTD, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowances on A&M expenses, finding the reassessment proceedings to be without jurisdiction as the assessee had fully disclosed material facts during the original assessment. Additions under Section 14A were also upheld as per the CIT(A)'s order.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s orders deleting disallowances made on Advertisement and Marketing expenses and reducing additions under Section 14A. The assessee also challenged the initiation of reassessment proceedings under Section 148.
What were the issues?
Validity of reassessment proceedings initiated after four years without failure to disclose material facts, and the correctness of disallowances made under Section 14A.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(3),Section 151,Section 14A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(30)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd.1,673 citing320 ITR 561 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT1,484 citing288 ITR 1 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.789 citing82 Taxmann.com 415 · 2017 · HC
- ITO v. Lakhmani Mewal Das721 citing103 ITR 437 · 1976 · SC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. Shiv Kumar Nayyar597 citing163 Taxmann.com 9 · 2024 · HC · Read judgment
- ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co.580 citing454 ITR 312 · 2023 · HC · Read judgment
- Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT499 citing374 ITR 118 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. Meenakshi Overseas Pvt. Ltd.471 citing395 ITR 677 · 2017 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Nikunj Exim Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.391 citing372 ITR 619 · 2015 · HC
- Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd. v. ITO384 citing41 ITR 191 · 1961 · SC · Read judgment
- ACB India Ltd. v. ACIT364 citing347 ITR 108 · 2015 · HC
- Chhugamal Rajpal v. S.P. Chaliha363 citing79 ITR 603 · 1971 · SC
- Eastern Investments Ltd. v. CIT346 citing38 ITR 601 · 1960 · SC
- Sassoon J. David & Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT323 citing118 ITR 261 · 1979 · SC
- CIT v. Walchand & Co.314 citing65 ITR 381 · 1967 · SC
- United Electrical Co. (P.) Ltd. v. CIT309 citing258 ITR 317 · 2002 · HC
- 394 ITR 146 (Guj.) 2. Varshaben S. Patel v. ITO295 citing338 ITR 51 · 2011 · HC
- 222 Taxman 15 (Gujarat)(MAG.), Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-4 v. G & G Pharma India Ltd.274 citing384 ITR 147 · 2016 · HC
- PCIT v. RMG Polyvinyl (I) Ltd.272 citing396 ITR 5 · 2017 · HC
- TM) Vishnu Jaiswal v. CIT272 citing357 ITR 146 · 2013 · HC
- CIT v. Foramer France253 citing264 ITR 567 · 2003 · SC
- CIT v. SFIL Stock Broking Ltd.243 citing325 ITR 285 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
- Ganga Saran and Sons P. Ltd. v. ITO234 citing130 ITR 1 · 1981 · SC
- CIT v. Usha International Ltd.231 citing348 ITR 485 · 2012 · HC · Read judgment
- Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. Subodh Agarwal194 citing149 Taxmann.com 373 · 2023 · HC
- CIT v. Atul Jain147 citing299 ITR 383 · 2008 · HC · Read judgment
- Jamshedpur Motor Accessories Stores v. CIT140 citing72 ITR 612 · 1969 · SC
- Sabh Infrastructure Ltd. v. ACIT137 citing398 ITR 198 · 2017 · HC
- Sony India (P) Ltd. v. DCIT131 citing114 ITD 448 · 2008 · ITAT
- 53 ITR 140 (SC), CIT v. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd.126 citing82 ITR 166 · 1971 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SUDHIR KUMAR & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM: These are five appeals filed by the Revenue against the separate orders of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi. All are dated 12.06.2023 for Assessment Years as tabulated as under: ITA Assessment Year Remarks 2442/Del/2023 2013-14 Order u/s 143(3)/147 2443/Del/2023 2014-15 Order u/s 143(3)/147 2444/Del/2023 2015-16 Order u/s 143(3) 2445/Del/2023 2016-17 Order u/s 143(3) 200/Del/2023 2019-20 Order u/s 143(3)
Since in all appeals, issues raised by the revenue are common and interlinked, therefore, all the appeals of the revenue a
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026