PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JAIPUR I vs. SHRI BADLURAM S/O SHRI BAH RAM
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court accepted the department's submission that the appeal should be disposed of as withdrawn based on the revised monetary limits. The appeal was dismissed in light of the new circular.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Department filed an appeal before the High Court. The department's counsel submitted that a new circular enhanced the monetary limit for filing appeals to Rs. 2 Crores, and the tax liability in this case was below that limit.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the department is maintainable given the revised monetary limits for filing appeals before the High Court as per the new circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 / 3 2024:CGHC:41798-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR TAXC No. 131 of 2024 1 - Income Tax Officer Ward-1(4) 1st Floor Aayakar Bhavan, Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - M/s G.P. Infraventures Shree Tower, Shankar Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent (Cause-title is taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. Amit Chaudhari, Advocate For Respondent : None Division Bench Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal & Hon'ble Shri Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Judgment on Board (23/10/2024) Sanjay K. Agrawal, J 1. When the case is taken for hearing and learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the Government of India, Ministry of Finance has issued a new circular dated 17.09.2024, in which monetary limits for filing Income Tax Appeals by the department before Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI
2 / 3 the High Court has been enhanced to Rs.2 Crores, whereas in the present case the tax liability of assess is less than Rs.2 Crore. Therefore, in light of aforesaid circular dated 17/09/2024, the present appeal may be disposed of finally. 2. The said prayer appears to be fair and reasonable. 3. For ready reference, relevant paragraphs of said circular dated 17/09/2024 is quoted hereinbelow: “1. Reference is invited to Circular No 5/2024 (F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt)) dated 15.03.2024 of Central Board of Direct Taxes (the 'Board') vide which monetary limits for filing of income tax appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLP/appeals before Supreme Court have been specified. Further, exceptions to the monetary limits were also specified vide paras 3.1 and 3.2 of the said Circular. 2. As a step towards management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board to revise the monetary limits for filing of appeals in Income-tax cases as stated in Para 4.1 of the aforementioned Circular as follows:- S. No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax matters Monetary
Limit (Tax effect in Rs.) 1. Before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 60 lakh 2. Before High Court 2 crore 3. Before Supreme Court 5 crore 3. Monetary limits given in paragraph 2 above with regard to filing appeal/SLP shall be applicable to all cases including those relating to TDS/TCS under the Income-tax Act, 1961 with exceptions as per paras 3.1 and 3.2 of Circular No 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024, where the decision to appeal/file SLP shall be taken on merits, without regard to the tax effect and the monetary limits. 4. It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is
3 / 3 to be decided on merits of the case. The officers concerned shall keep in mind the overall objective of reducing unnecessary litigation and providing certainty to taxpayers on their Income-tax assessments while taking a decision regarding filing an appeal. 5. The modifications shall come into effect from the date of issue of this Circular. This Circular will apply to SLPs/appeals to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal. It shall also apply to the SLPs/ appeals pending before Supreme Court/High Courts/Tribunal, which may accordingly be withdrawn. 6. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned. 7. This issues under section 268A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 8. Hindi version will follow. ” 4. In view aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the appellant where monetary limit (tax liability) in the present case is less than Rs.2 Crores therefore, in light of aforesaid circular (Para-5) dated 17/09/2024, the instant Tax Case stands disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Judge Ravi Mandavi
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026