THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. SMT. REKHA SHEKHAWAT
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's submission regarding the revised monetary limits for filing appeals. Based on the new circular, the appeal was disposed of as the tax effect was below the prescribed threshold.
What were the facts?
The appellant, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, sought to withdraw the present appeal. They cited a new circular from the Ministry of Finance that enhanced the monetary limit for filing appeals before the High Court to Rs. 2 Crores. The tax liability in the present case was less than this enhanced limit.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn based on the revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the department before the High Court.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
2025:CGHC:18515-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR TAXC No. 21 of 2023 • Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (CPC) Bengaluru, Karnataka.
...Appellant. versus • Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited Ground Floor, Vidyut Bhawan, Dangania, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 492001 (Pan- AADCC5772C).
... Respondent(s). For Appellant : Shri Ajay Kumrani, Advocate. For Respondent : Shri Harshal Chouhan, Advocate.
Division Bench Hon'ble
Shri
Jus
tice
Sanjay
K. Agrawal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Judgment on Board (24.04.2025) Sanjay
K. Agrawal, J.
When case is taken for hearing learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the Government of India, Ministry of Finance has issued a new circular dated AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2025.05.01 14:21:02 +0530
2 17.09.2024, in which monetary limits for filing Income Tax Appeals by the department before the High Court has been enhanced to Rs.2 Crores, whereas in the present case the tax liability of assess is less than Rs.2 Crore. Therefore, in light of aforesaid circular dated 17/09/2024, the present appeal may be disposed of finally. 2. The said prayer appears to be fair and reasonable. 3. For ready reference, relevant paragraphs of said circular dated 17/09/2024 is quoted hereinbelow: “1. Reference is invited to Circular No.5/2024(F.No.279/Misc.142/2007- ITJ(Pt)) dated15.03.2024 of Central Board of Direct Taxes (the 'Board') vide which monetary limits for filing of income tax appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLP/appeals before Supreme Court have been specified. Further, exceptions to the monetary limits were also specified vide paras 3.1 and 3.2 of the said Circular. 2. As a step towards management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board to revise the monetary limits for filing of appeals in Income-tax cases as stated in Para 4.1 of the aforementioned Circular as follows:- S.No Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax matters Monetary Limit (Tax effect in Rs.) 1. Before Income Tax 60 lakh
3 Appellate Tribunal 2. Before High Court 2 crore 3. Before Supreme Court 5 crore 3. Monetary limits given in paragraph 2 above with regard to filing appeal/SLP shall be applicable to all cases including those relating to TDS/TCS under the Income-tax Act, 1961 with exceptions as per paras 3.1 and 3.2 of Circular No 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024, where the decision to appeal/file SLP shall be taken on merits, without regard to the tax effect and the monetary limits. 4. It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. The officers concerned shall keep in mind the overall objective of reducing unnecessary litigation and providing certainty to taxpayers on their Income-tax assessments while taking a decision regarding filing an appeal.
4 5. The modifications shall come into effect from the date of issue of this Circular. This Circular will apply to SLPs/appeals to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal. It shall also apply to the SLPs/ appeals pending before Supreme Court/High Courts/Tribunal, which may accordingly be withdrawn. 6. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned. 7. This issues under section 268A of the Income- tax Act, 1961. 8. Hindi version will follow.” 4. In view of aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the appellant where monetary limit (tax liability) in the present case is less than Rs.2 Crores therefore, in light of aforesaid circular (Para-5) dated 17/09/2024, the instant Tax Case stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Judge Avinash
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026