PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 vs. M/S. UB INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS LTD.,

PDF · subscribers
ITA/556/2017HC KarnatakaKAHC01051494201724 October 2019Bench: RAVI MALIMATH,ASHOK S.KINAGI3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the Revenue's counsel regarding monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the maintainability of the appeal before the High Court due to the monetary limits stipulated in a CBDT circular.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

ON THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH

AND

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.556 OF 2017

BETWEEN:

1.

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 BMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU .

2.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BENGALURU. ...APPELLANTS

(BY SRI E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)

AND: M/S. UB INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS LIMITED UB TOWERS, LEVEL 12, UB CITY, NO.24, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENT

(BY SRI K.R. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE AND SMT. GIRIJA G.P., ADVOCATE)

2 THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 31.03.2017 PASSED IN ITA NO.1210/BANG/2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-2011, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND / OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON’BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 31.03.2017 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘C’ BENCH, BENGALURU AS SOUGHT FOR, IN THE RESPONDENT- ASSESSEE’S CASE, IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN ITA NO.1210/BANG/2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010- 2011 AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

*****

THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellants submit that the appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary limits in terms of Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 passed by Director (ITJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi.

2.

In view of the submission made, the appeal is dismissed as such.

Sd/-

Sd/- JUDGE

JUDGE

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →