EIT SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

PDF · subscribers
ITA/599/2016HC KarnatakaKAHC01044675201624 March 2021Bench: ALOK ARADHE,M.G.S. KAMAL3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal as the issue had become academic. The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal.

What were the facts?

The assessee company filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the withdrawal of an appeal due to the matter becoming academic.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021

PRESENT

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

AND

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL

I.T.A. NO.599 OF 2016

BETWEEN:

EIT SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS HEWLETT PACKARD GLOBALSOFT PVT. LTD.) PLOT NO.39/40, ELECTRONIC CITY, PHASE-II, HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 100 REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR. M.S. PRAKASH ...APPELLANT

(BY MS.MAHIMA GOUD, ADVOCATE FOR SRI T.SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

OF INCOME-TAX-CIRCLE

3(1)(2)(ERSTWHILE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

OF INCOME-TAX-CIRCLE 11(4),

ROOM NO.228, 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING,

80 FT ROAD, KORAMANGALA

BANGALORE-560 095.

2.

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER

OF INCOME TAX-3

BMTC BUILDING,

KORAMANGALA 6TH BLOCK,

BANGALORE-560 095. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JEEVAN J.NEERALGI, ADVOCATE)

- - -

THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX APPEAL ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED:24/06/2016 PASSED IN IT(TP)A NO.162/BANG/2012, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-2006 ANNEXURE-L PRAYING TO (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL DATED:24/06/2016 PASSED IN IT(TP)A NO.162(BANG)2012 (ANNEXURE-L), TO THE EXTENT QUESTIONED HEREIN; AND (iii) PASS SUCH OTHER OR SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO PASS ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Ms. Mahima Goud, learned counsel for Shri T.Suryanarayana, learned counsel for the assessee.

Shri Jeevan J.Neeralgi, learned counsel for the revenue.

Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the issue involved in this appeal has been rendered academic.

Memo is taken on record.

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same, in case occasion so arises.

Sd/- JUDGE

Sd/- JUDGE

CA CHAITHRA A Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Date: 2021.03.25 16:16:02 +0530

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →