THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GOKULA EDUCATION
What did the High Court hold?
The appellant (Revenue) sought to withdraw the appeal. The Court granted the leave to withdraw the appeal and accordingly dismissed it as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court of Karnataka against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal filed by the Revenue should be allowed to be withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
- 1 -
ITA No. 25 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 25 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL, 3RD FLOOR C.R. BUILDING QUEEN’S ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -1(2) 3RD FLOOR C.R. BUILDING QUEEN’S ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 …APPELLANTS
(BY SHRI. K.V. ARAVIND, SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL) AND M/S. GOKULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION (MEDICAL) MSR NAGAR, MSRIT POSTS MATHICARE BENGALURU-560 064 PAN-AAATG1779Q …RESPONDENT
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW THE
Digitally signed by YASHODHA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
ITA No. 25 of 2023
APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN C.O. NO. *12/BANG/2021 (IN ITA NO.*499/BANG/2021) DATED 18.07.2022 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR *2011-2012 ANNEXURE-C CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 1(2), BENGALURU AND ETC.
THIS ITA, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Shri M.Dilip, learned Standing Counsel for the appellant has filed a memo of even date seeking leave to withdraw this appeal.
Memo be kept in record. Leave granted. This appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
YN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6
* Corrections carried out vide Court order dated 24.02.2023
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026