THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , INTERNATIONAL TAXATION vs. M/S COMMUNICATIONS GLOBAL NETWORK SERVICES LTD,

PDF · subscribers
ITA/4/2024HC KarnatakaKAHC01069612202325 March 2024Bench: S.G.PANDIT,C.M. POONACHA4 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that payments made to non-resident telecom operators for interconnect services and transfer of capacity are not chargeable to tax as royalty. This decision was based on a previous judgment by the same court.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed against an ITAT order that partly allowed the assessee's appeal for AY 2009-2010. The core issue was whether payments for interconnect service charges to a non-resident could be taxed as royalty.

What were the issues?

Whether interconnect service charges paid to a non-resident telecom operator constitute royalty income taxable in India.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

- 1 -

NC: 2024:KHC:12158-DB ITA No. 4 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4 OF 2024 BETWEEN:

1.

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 4TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU - 560 095.

2.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE-2(1), 4TH FLOOR BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU - 560 095. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. Y.V. RAVIRAJ A/W SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATES)

AND:

M/S COMMUNICATIONS GLOBAL NETWORK SERVICES LTD, 81, NEWGATE STREET, LONDON, EC1A 7AJ, UNITED KINGDOM, PAN:AAGCC 9220K. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. T. SURYANARAYANA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR Ms. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High Court of Karnataka

- 2 -

NC: 2024:KHC:12158-DB ITA No. 4 of 2024

THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN IT(IT)A NO. 89/BANG/2019 DATED 29/08/2023 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010 ANNEXURE-A AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE DRP CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-2(1), BENGALURU.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, S.G.PANDIT J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT 1. This appeal is by the Revenue challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 29.08.2023 in Appeal IT(IT)A No. 89/BANG/2019 partly allowing the assessee appeal for the assessment year 2009-2010 vide Annexure-A.

2.

Heard learned counsel Sri. Y. V. Raviraj along with learned counsel Sri. Dilip M., for the appellants and Sri. T. Suryanarayana, learned Senior Counsel for Ms. Tanmayee Rajkumar, learned counsel for the respondent. 3. Perused the appeal papers.

- 3 -

NC: 2024:KHC:12158-DB ITA No. 4 of 2024

4.

By order dated 10.01.2024, the present appeal was admitted. In sum and substance the substantial question of law involved in the above appeal is as to payment towards interconnect service charges could be chargeable to tax as royalty. 5. The above question is answered in ITA No.160/2015 and connected appeals. This Court by Judgment dated 14.07.2023, at paragraph 21 has held as follows: "21. The third question is, whether the payments made to NTOS for providing interconnect services and transfer of capacity in foreign countries is chargeable to tax as royalty. It was argued by Shri. Pardiwala, that for subsequent years in assessee's own case, the ITAT has held that tax is not deductable when payment is made to non-resident telecom operator. This factual aspect is not refuted. Thus the Revenue has reviewed its earlier stand for the subsequent assessment years placing reliance on Viacom etc35, rendered by the ITAT. In that view of the matter this question also needs to be answered against the Revenue."

6.

The observation made by this Court in ITA No.160/2015 and connected matters would squarely apply to the question raised in the present appeal also. Therefore, in terms of the

- 4 -

NC: 2024:KHC:12158-DB ITA No. 4 of 2024

said Judgment dated 14.07.2023 in ITA No.160/2015 and connected matters, the substantial question of law is answered against the Revenue. Hence, the present appeal also stands dismissed.

SD/- JUDGE

SD/- JUDGE

sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →