Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22624-DB ITA No. 248 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 248 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 BMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE - 1(1) (2) BENGALURU. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SANMATHI E. I., ADV.)
AND: M/S. BROADCOM COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED (EARLIER KNOWN AS BROADCOM INDIA RESEARCH PRIVATE LIMITED) S1, WIPRO ELECTRONIC CITY SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE, DODDATHOGUR VILLAGE BEGUR HOBLI, ELECTRONIC CITY BANGALORE – 560100.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. MANASA ANANTHAN, ADV. FOR SMT. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADV.)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 14.06.2019 PASSED IN IT (TP)A NO.1929/BANG/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22624-DB ITA No. 248 of 2020
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
Learned counsel Sri.E.I.Sanmathi for appellants/Revenue on instructions submit that dispute between the appellants and respondent is settled under ‘The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and Form-4 has been issued. Further, learned counsel would submit that in view of the above development, appeal would no more survive for consideration.
Submission of the learned counsel is placed on record.
Appeal is disposed of as having become infructous. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
NC CT:bms: List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2