THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE 2(3), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. It held that interest under Section 201(1A) is not leviable if the TDS shortfall is rectified within the financial year as per Section 192(3). It also held that interest under Section 220(2) is not applicable as no demand notice was issued.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged the levy of interest under Section 201(1A) and 220(2) of the Income Tax Act for late TDS deduction on salaries of floating staff and for non-payment of demand. The delay in filing the appeal was due to the CIT(A)'s order being found in the spam folder.
What were the issues?
Whether interest under Section 201(1A) is leviable for late TDS deduction on salaries when the deficit is made good within the financial year, and whether interest under Section 220(2) is applicable without a demand notice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji3,926 citing167 ITR 471 · 1987 · SC
- 247 ITR 305 (Guj) CIT v. Nestle India Ltd.172 citing140 ITR 832 · 1983 · HC
- CIT v. Enron Expat Services Inc.29 citing330 ITR 496 · 2010
- CIT v. Delhi Public School7 citing247 CTR 317
- 7 citing
- Hero Honda Motors Ltd. v. ITO (7 citing41 TTJ 28 · ITAT
- Vinsons v. Third ITO (7 citing89 ITD 267 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN & MS. PADMAVATHY S
PER BENCH: The present appeals have been filed by the assessee challenging the common impugned order 27.06.2024, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’), by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (‘Ld. CIT(A)’), for the A.Ys 2012-13 to 2019-20. The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd, Mumbai
Since all the issues involved in these eight appeals are common and identical, therefore, they have been clubbed, heard together and consolidated order is being
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 192
- Sbi, (Erstwhile Sbbj), Baran vs ITO (TDS), KotaITA 143/JPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Rushikant Jaywantrao Shinde, Mumbai vs DCIT, Circle 20(1), MumbaiITA 2019/MUM/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Jayamma, Shivamogga vs Income Tax Officer Ward 1, ShivamoggaITA 1268/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Jayamma, Shivamogga vs Income Tax Officer Ward 1, ShivamoggaITA 1267/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Banshidhar Enterprises, Main Road, Charhi… vs ITO Ward 1(1) Hazaribagh, HazaribaghITA 134/RAN/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026