ACIT CEN CIR 2, THANE vs. A.C. CHENNA REDDY, PANVEL

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1850/MUM/2011Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 March 2018AY 2006-0720 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the assessee did not produce necessary evidence before the Assessing Officer or CIT(A) regarding the genuineness of contract receipts and partnership deeds. Therefore, the appeals were remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee's books of accounts were lost, and the assessment was framed ex-parte under Section 144 r/w Section 147 of the Act after search and seizure. The assessee failed to attend proceedings or furnish details, and the CIT(A) admitted additional evidence, which the revenue disputed.

What were the issues?

The key issues were the assessee's failure to produce books of accounts and evidence, and whether income belonging to a partnership firm could be taxed in the hands of an individual assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 132,Section 144,Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 158BC,Section 292B,Section 184,Section 185

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES “J”, MUMBAI

Before: Shri Joginder Singh, & Shri N.K. Pradhan

For Appellant: Shri Prakash G
For Respondent: Shri B. Srinivas a/w, Ms. Aarju Garodia
Hearing: 14/03/2018

आदेश की प्रयिलऱपप अग्रेपषि/Copy of the Order forwarded to :

More judgments on Section 132

All 14,598 judgments and leading authorities on Section 132 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →