HINDUSTAN COCA-COLA BEVERAGES PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT, SPECIAL RANGE- 4, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's grounds regarding disallowance of repair and maintenance and staff welfare expenses, finding the Assessing Officer's disallowances to be ad-hoc and without rejecting the books of account. However, the Tribunal sustained the addition for delayed payment of PF/ESI, following a Supreme Court judgment.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Company Pvt. Ltd., filed appeals against orders of the CIT(Appeals) concerning AYs 2011-12 to 2013-14. The appeals involved issues such as disallowance of bad debts, traffic challans, security deposits, and additions on account of inventory losses, repair and maintenance, staff welfare expenses, and delayed payment of PF/ESI.
What were the issues?
Whether ad-hoc disallowances made by the AO without rejecting books of accounts are sustainable, and whether delayed payments of PF/ESI are deductible.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Indo Nippon Chemicals Co. Ltd.204 citing261 ITR 275 · 2003 · SC
- Challapalli Sugars Ltd. v. CIT185 citing98 ITR 167 · 1975 · SC
- CIT v. Calcutta Agency Ltd.164 citing19 ITR 191 · 1951 · SC
- Prakash Cotton Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT133 citing225 ITR 383 · 1993 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd.120 citing162 Taxmann 60 · 2007 · HC · Read judgment
- 19 ITR 191 Lakshimaratan Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. CIT (SC)61 citing73 ITR 634 · 1969 · SC
- Jamna Auto Industries v. CIT25 citing167 Taxmann 192 · 2008 · HC
- Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. v. DCIT6 citing6 SOT 10 · 2006 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’: NEW DELHI
Heard together (5 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JM:
All the above appeals are filed by the Assessee and Revenue
against the respective orders of the Ld. CIT (Appeals) for the asses
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026