DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S INTEGRATED COAL MINING LTD., KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the disallowances of RE Cess and PE Cess were not warranted, following its prior ruling. Similarly, the disallowances under Section 14A, including those for book profit computation under Section 115JB, were also deleted based on the precedent.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order deleting disallowances related to RE Cess, PE Cess, and Section 14A expenses. The assessee argued that these issues were covered by a previous ITAT decision in their own case.
What were the issues?
Whether RE Cess and PE Cess are deductible under Section 43B, and whether disallowances under Section 14A are applicable to book profits under Section 115JB.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.2,664 citing88 ITR 172 · 1973 · SC
- CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.2,118 citing313 ITR 340 · 2009 · HC
- CIT v. Corrtech Energy (P.) Ltd.579 citing352 ITR 97 · 2014 · HC
- Cheminvest Ltd. v. ITO338 citing121 ITD 318 · 2009 · ITAT
- Chowringhee Sales Bureau (P.) Ltd. v. CIT155 citing87 ITR 542 · 1973 · SC
- Dy CIT v. Selvel Advertising (P) Ltd.49 citing58 Taxmann.com 196 · 2015 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D”, BENCH KOLKATA
Before: SHRI S.S. GODARA, JM & DR. A.L. SAINI, AM
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant – DCIT, Circle 6(1), Kolkata. 1. 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent- M/s. Integrated Coal Mining Ltd. आयकर आयु�त(अपील) / The CIT(A), 3. आयकर आयु�त / CIT 4. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, कोलकाता / DR, ITAT, Kolkata 5. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. 6.
//True Copy// By Order
Senior Private Secretary, Head of Office/D.D.O, I.T.A.T, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata.
More judgments on Section 43B
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Private… vs The Dy CIT Circle 8(2)(1), MumbaiITA 8020/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amritvarsha Industries Limited, Ambedkar… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6481/DEL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2010-2011
- Karaj Singh, Haryana vs PCIT (Central) Gurgaon, GurgaonITA 642/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Imp Powers Limited, MumbaiITA 4982/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026