ADDL. CIT, BULANDSHAHR vs. M/S. ZILA SAHKARI BANK LTD, BULANDSHAHR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that Circular No. 6/2010 clarified that Regional Rural Banks are not eligible for deduction under Section 80P from AY 2007-08 onwards due to the amendment of Section 80P by the Finance Act, 2006. The CIT(A) had not considered this circular.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a regional rural bank, claimed exemption on dividend income received from cooperative banks. The Assessing Officer disallowed this exemption, stating that Section 80P deduction was not available from AY 2007-08 onwards. The CIT(A) allowed the exemption, holding that Section 80P(2)(d) covered it.
What were the issues?
Whether a Regional Rural Bank is eligible for deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2007-08, considering the amendment by the Finance Act, 2006 and subsequent clarifications.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “D”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI H.S.SIDHU & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
O R D E R PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M. 1. This is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order of the ld CIT(A), Meerut dated 20.09.2013 for the Assessment Year 2007-08. 2. The Revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal:- “1. That the ld CIT(A) has failed to notice that section 80P of the IT Act was amended by the Finance Act, 2006 with effect from 01.04.2007 introducing subsection (4) which laid down specifically that the provisions of section 80P will not apply to any cooperative bank and accordingly deduction u/s 80P was no more available to any regional rural banks from Assessment Year 2007-08.
2. That the ld CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 8607600/- in view of the OM Dated 25.08.2006 addressed to RBI clarifying that regional Rural Banks would not be eligible for deduction u/s 80P of IT Act from Assessment Year 2007-08.
3. The ld CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 8607600/- in view of the circular NO. 6/2010 dated 20.09.2010 which clarified that circular BNO. 319 dated 11.01.1982 deeming any Regional Rural Bank to be cooperative Society stands withdrawn and RRBs are not eligible for deduction u/s 80P from the Assessment Year 2007-08.
3. Briefly stated the facts are that assessee is engaged in the business of banking. The assessee derives income from house property. The in the profit and loss account. The assessee is credited dividend income of Rs. 8 607600 from UP cooperative bank Ltd as well as Indian farmers and fertilisers cooperative Ltd., The assessee filed its return of income for Rs. 1 060 8800 on 29/10/2007. The return of income was further revised on 31/10/2008 to Rs. 2 Page 2 of 3 001200/–. The reason for revision was that the dividend income credited to the profit and loss account of Rs. 8 607600 was claimed as exempt and not chargeable to tax. The Ld. assessing officer picked up the case of the assessee for scrutiny and held that the claim of the assessee is not acceptable. In view of the reason that on the dividend income. No dividend distribution tax under section 1150 of the act has been paid. The Ld. assessing officer further noted that that in this year. The deduction under section 80 P is not available to the assessee and therefore on these dividend income such exemption is also not available. Consequently, assessment under section 143 (3 of the income tax act was passed on 18/11/2009 by the Ld. assessing officer determining the total income of the assessee at Rs. 1 079 8800/–.
4. The assessee aggrieved with the order of the Ld. assessing officer preferred appeal before the Ld. CIT (A), Meerut who per order dated 20/09/2013 allowed the claim of the assessee of exemption of dividend from cooperative societies holding that provisions of section 80 P (2) (d) covers the above exemption.
5. Revenue aggrieved with the order of the Ld. CIT (A) has preferred an appeal before us. The Ld. departmental representative submitted that it has been clarified wide circular dated 25/08/2006, wherein it has been stated that regional rural banks would not be eligible for deduction under section 80 P of the income tax act from assessment year 2007 – 08. He therefore submitted that for assessment year 2007 – 08, no exemption under section 80 P of the act is allowable to the regional rural banks holding them as cooperative banks.
The Ld. authorised representative submitted that the order of the Ld. CIT appeal is correct as the assessee is eligible for deduction under section 80 P of the income tax act. As the dividend received by the assessee falls under the business of the banking and therefore the claim of the assessee is correctly allowed.
We have carefully considered the rival contention as well as also perused the orders of the lower authorities. The simple issue raised before us is whether the assessee is eligible for deduction under section 80 P of the income tax act or not for assessment year 2007 – 08. Circular No. 6/2010, dated 20/09/2010 covers the above issue as under:-
SECTION 80P OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - DEDUCTION IN RESPECT OF INCOME OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES - CLARIFICATION REGARDING ELIGIBILITY OF DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P TO REGIONAL RURAL BANKS CIRCULAR NO. 6/2010 [F.NO. 173(3)/44/2009-IT (A-I)], DATED 20-9-2010 Section 80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961 provides for a deduction from the income of cooperative societies referred to in that section.
As Regional Rural Banks (RRB) are basically corporate entities (and not cooperative societies), they were considered to be not eligible for deduction under section 80P when the section was originally introduced. However, as Page 3 of 3 section 22 of the Regional Rural Bank Act provides that a RRB shall be deemed to be cooperative society for the purposes of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in order to make such banks eligible for deduction under section 80P, CBDT issued a beneficial Circular No. 319 dated 11-1-1982, which stated that for the purpose of section 80P, a Regional Rural Bank shall be deemed to be a cooperative society.
Section 80P was amended by the Finance Act, 2006, with effect from 1-4- 2007 introducing sub-section (4), which laid down specifically that the provisions of section 80P will not apply to any cooperative bank other than a Primary Agricultural Credit Society or a Primary Cooperative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank. Accordingly, deduction under section 80P was no more available to any Regional Rural Bank from assessment year 2007-08 onwards. An OM dated 25-8-2006 addressed to RBI was issued by the Board clarifying that Regional Rural Banks would not be eligible for deduction under section 80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961 from the assessment year 2007-08 onwards.
It has been bought to the notice of the Board that despite the amended provisions, some Regional Rural Banks continue to claim deduction under section 80P on the ground that they are cooperative societies covered by section 80P(1) read with Boards Circular No. 319 dated 11-1-1982.
It is, therefore, reiterated that Regional Rural Banks are not eligible for deduction under section 80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961 from the assessment year 2007-08 onwards. Further more, the Circular No. 319 dated 11-1-1982 deeming any Regional Rural Bank to be cooperative society stands withdrawn for application with effect from assessment year 2007-08. The field officers may take note of this position and take remedial action, if required.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026