THE PR. COMMISISONER OF INCOME-TAX, vs. M/S VECTRA ADVANCED ENGINEERING PVT.LTD.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the appeals were not maintainable as per the circular concerning monetary limits for filing appeals. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an ITAT order. The Revenue's counsel submitted that the appeals were not maintainable due to a circular regarding monetary limits.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the appeal before the High Court based on the monetary limit prescribed by a circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC:33842-DB ITA No. 127 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 127 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX 5TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA BENGALURU-560 095 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE-7(1)(2), PRESENT ADDRESS, DCIT CIRCLE 7(1)(1), 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA BENGALURU 560 095
… APPELLANTS (BY SRI. DILIP M., ADV.) AND: M/S VECTRA ADVANCED ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. VECTRA HOUSE, NO. 15, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560009. PAN: AABCV 1355K …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHARATH S., ADV. FOR SRI. TATA KRISHNA, ADV.)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO i. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE. ii. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN ITA NO. 127/BANG/2019 DATED 01/04/2021 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014 ANNEXURE -C AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER Digitally signed by MALA K N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2023:KHC:33842-DB ITA No. 127 of 2023 PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-7(1) (1), BENGALURU AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Shri M. Dilip, learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue submitted that these appeals are not maintainable in view of Circular No.17/2019 [F.NO.279/MISC.142/2007-ITJ(PT.)], dated 08.08.2019, as the monetary effect is less than Rs.1 Crore.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 3. In view of dismissal of the appeal, I.A.No.2/2023 does not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of.
No costs. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE PA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026