THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ACER INDIA PVT LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the Revenue's request to withdraw the appeal. The withdrawal was without prejudice to the issues involved in other related appeals.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Revenue sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue should be permitted to withdraw its appeal against the ITAT's order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY 2022 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ I.T.A. NO.154 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX 4TH FLOOR, HMT BHAVAN NO.59, BELLARY ROAD GANGANAGAR BENGALURU-560032. 2. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE-1(1), 4TH FLOOR HMT BHAVAN, NO.59, BELLARY ROAD GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. .... APPELLANTS (BY MR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. ACER INDIA PVT. LTD., NO.13, 6TH FLOOR EMBASSY HEIGHTS MARGATH ROAD NEXT TO HOSMAT HOSPITAL BENGALURU-560025 PAN:BLRAO 1844D. ... RESPONDENT (BY MR. SURYANARAYANA, SR. COUNSEL FOR MS. MANASA ANANTHAN, ADVOCATE)
2 THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 14.09.2018 PASSED IN C.O.NO.52/BANG/2018 IN ITA NO.2571/B/2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11, PRAYING TO: (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN C.O.NO.52/BANG/2018 IN ITA NO.2571/B/2017 DATED 14.09.2018 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11 ANNEXURE-C AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRIMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), CIRCLE-1(1), BENGALURU & ETC. THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the revenue seeks leave of this court to withdraw the appeal without prejudice to the issue involved in I.T.A.No.150/2019, I.T.A.No.151/2019 and I.TA.No.152/2019.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to
3 raise the issues in I.T.A.No.150/2019, I.T.A.No.151/2019 and I.TA.No.152/2019. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE ss
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026