THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S KENNAMETAL INC.,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court decided that this appeal is substantially similar to a previously decided coordinate case. Therefore, the same order as in the coordinate case would apply here.
What were the facts?
This is an Income Tax Appeal filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal concerns the assessment year 2012-2013.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the order of the ITAT was sustainable in law, given its similarity to a previously adjudicated matter.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8033-DB ITA No. 421 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.421 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, 4TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA, BENGALURU – 560 095.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE 1(1), PRESENT ADDRESS DCIT INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE 1(2), 4TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA, BENGALURU – 560 095. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SANMATHI E.I, AND SRI. M. DILIP ADVOCATES)
AND:
M/S KENNAMETAL INC., C/O KENNAMETAL INDIA, 8TH / 9TH MILE, TUMKUR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560073 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K R VASUDEVAN, ADVOCATE)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAS FILED UNDER SEC. 260- A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 09/12/2021 PASSED IN ITA NO. 805/BANG/2019, FOR THE
Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYAN N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8033-DB ITA No. 421 of 2022
ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-2013 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.805/BANG/2019 DATED 09/12/2021 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-2013 ANNEXURE-C AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSIONS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT)
The subject matter of this Appeal is substantially similar to the one this day decided by us in ITA No.418/2022 between THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. KENNAMETAL INC. Like cases should be decided alike being adjudicatory norm, what has been ordered in the coordinate case would apply to this case also. Accordingly, this Appeal is also disposed off.
Costs made easy.
Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE DR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026