THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S TIMBLO PVT LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court granted the Revenue's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to refile before the appropriate court.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an ITAT order. The Revenue's counsel later filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue should be allowed to be withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
I.T.A.No.232/2022
BETWEEN :
1 . THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING, QUEEN’S ROAD, BENGALURU-560001
2 . THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, PLOT NO.5, EDC COMPLEX, PATTO, PANAJI-403001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI M.DILIP, ADV. FOR SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND :
M/s TIMBLO PVT. LTD., KADAR MANZIL, NEAR HARI MANDIR, MARGAO, GOA-403601 PAN: AABCT1944N
…RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 07.10.2021 PASSED IN IT(SS)A NO.15/PAN/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND
- 2 -
ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN IT(SS)A NO.15/PAN/2017 DATED 07.10.2021 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010 ANNEXURE-D CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI, GOA.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, S. SUJATHA, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the above appeal with liberty to file the same before the appropriate Court.
Memo is placed on record. Permission is granted.
Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought for.
- 3 -
Registry shall return the original documents, if any, to the appellants, keeping photocopies of the same for record purpose.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
PMR
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026