THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S COFFEE DAY ENTERPRISES LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, following a previous decision in the assessee's own case for AY 2013-14 on identical issues. The court found parity of reasoning warranted the dismissal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against an ITAT order concerning disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D for AY 2015-16. The dispute centered on the applicability of Circular No. 5/2014.
What were the issues?
Whether the Tribunal correctly applied Circular No. 5/2014 and deleted the disallowance under Section 14A r.w. Rule 8D.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BENGALURU
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47766-DB ITA No. 39 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 39 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL, 3RD FLOOR, C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), 3RD FLOOR, C.R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
…APPELLANTS (BY SRI. Y V RAVIRAJ.,ADVOCATE A/W SRI. M. DILIP., ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S COFFEE DAY ENTERPRISES LTD NO.23/2, COFFEE DAY SQUARE, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR.,ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47766-DB ITA No. 39 of 2025
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC. 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.781/BANG/2024 DATED 23.07.2024 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-2016 ANNEXURE A CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(3), BENGALURU.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47766-DB ITA No. 39 of 2025
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD)
The Revenue's appeal is as against the order dated 23.07.2024 in ITA No.781/Bang/2024. These orders relate to the assessment year 2015-16, and the dispute is over the disallowance computed by the Assessing Officer under Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules applying Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This appeal is admitted for consideration of the following substantial questions of law: "1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in not considering the Circular No.5/2014 dated 11.02.2014 on the issue of disallowance under Section 14A r.w. Rule 8D.
Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in deleting the addition on disallowance under Section 14 r.w. Rule 8D?
It is undisputed that the Revenue's appeal in ITA No.2/2020 in the Assessee's own case relevant to
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47766-DB ITA No. 39 of 2025
the assessment year 2013-14, on the same set of questions, is dismissed answering the questions in favour of the Assessee. On perusal of the records, this Court opines that for parity of reasoning this appeal must also be dismissed holding that the substantial questions proposed are answered in favour of the Assessee as is opined in the appeal in ITA No.2/2020.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
SA ct:sr
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026