PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 vs. HIMANSU MOHAPATRA
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court accepted the appellant's submission that the tax liability in the present case was below the enhanced monetary limit. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of in light of the new circular.
What were the facts?
The appellant, the Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, sought to withdraw the appeal before the High Court. This was based on a new circular from the Ministry of Finance enhancing the monetary limit for filing appeals to Rs. 2 Crores.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn based on revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the department. The applicability of the new circular to pending appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 / 4
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR TAXC No. 18 of 2022 • Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central -2), Raipur Chhattisgarh.
... Appellant versus • M/s Shree Jagdamba Construction Co. Flat No. 222, 2nd Floor, Krishna Arcade, Lodhipara Chowk, Raipur Chhattisgarh 492001. ... Respondent For Appellant : Mr. Amit Chaudhari, Advocate For Respondent : None.
Division Bench Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal & Hon'ble Shri Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Judgment on Board (23.09.2024) Sanjay K. Agrawal, J 1. When the case is taken for hearing and learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the Government of India, Ministry of Finance has issued a new circular dated 17.09.2024, in which monetary limits for filing Income Tax Appeals by the VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2024.09.24 16:31:23 +0530
2 / 4 department before the High Court has been enhanced to Rs.2 Crores, whereas in the present appeal the tax liability of assess is less than Rs.2 Crore. Therefore, in light of aforesaid circular dated 17/09/2024, the present appeal may be disposed of finally. 2. The said prayer appears to be fair and reasonable. 3. For ready reference, relevant paragraphs of said circular dated 17/09/2024 is quoted hereinbelow: “1. Reference is invited to Circular No 5/2024 (F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt))
dated 15.03.2024 of Central Board of Direct Taxes (the 'Board') vide which monetary limits for filing of income tax appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLP/appeals before Supreme Court have been specified. Further, exceptions to the monetary limits were also specified vide paras 3.1 and 3.2 of the said Circular. 2. As a step towards management of litigation, it has been decided by the Board to revise the monetary limits for filing of appeals in Income-tax cases as stated in Para 4.1 of the aforementioned Circular as follows:- S.No Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax matters Monetary Limit (Tax effect in Rs.) 1. Before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 60 lakh 2. Before High Court 2 crore 3. Before Supreme Court 5 crore
3 / 4 3. Monetary limits given in paragraph 2 above with regard to filing appeal/SLP shall be applicable to all cases including those relating to TDS/TCS under the Income-tax Act, 1961 with exceptions as per paras 3.1 and 3.2 of Circular No 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024, where the decision to appeal/file SLP shall be taken on merits, without regard to the tax effect and the monetary limits. 4. It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. The officers concerned shall keep in mind the overall objective of reducing unnecessary litigation and providing certainty to taxpayers on their Income-tax assessments while taking a decision regarding filing an appeal. 5. The modifications shall come into effect from the date of issue of this Circular. This Circular will apply to SLPs/appeals to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal. It shall also apply to the SLPs/ appeals pending before Supreme Court/High Courts/Tribunal, which may accordingly be withdrawn. 6. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.
4 / 4 7. This issues under section 268A of the Income- tax Act, 1961. 8. Hindi version will follow. ” 4. In view aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the appellant where monetary limit (tax liability) in the present case is Rs. 1,92,62,017/- which is less than Rs.2 Crores therefore, in light of aforesaid circular (Para-5) dated 17/09/2024, the instant Tax Case stands disposed of finally. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Judge vaishali
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026