THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SAHARA AIRLINES LTD.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that no question of law arises from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision. The Tribunal had accepted the assessee's plea that the payments were not royalty and no Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) was deductible.
What were the facts?
The assessee made payments to foreign companies (Amadeus Marketing and Galileo International) for software used in ticket reservations. The Assessing Officer considered these payments as royalty and sought tax deduction. The assessee argued that services were rendered outside India and income accrued offshore.
What were the issues?
Whether payments made to foreign companies for software used in ticket reservations constitute royalty and are subject to TDS under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
#### IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA No. 1176/2009 & CM No. 16086/2009
ITA No. 1177/2009 & CM No. 16088/2009 ITA No. 1178/2009 & CM No. 16090/2009 ITA No. 1179/2009 & CM No. 16092/2009 ITA No. 1180/2009 & CM No. 16094/2009 ITA No. 1181/2009 & CM No. 16096/2009 ITA No. 1182/2009 & CM No. 16098/2009 ITA No. 1183/2009 & CM No. 16100/2009 ITA No. 1184/2009 & CM No. 16102/2009 ITA No. 1185/2009 & CM No. 16104/2009 ITA No. 1186/2009 & CM No. 16105/2009 ITA No. 1190/2009 & CM No. 16112/2009 ITA No. 1191/2009 & CM No. 16114/2009 ITA No. 1192/2009 & CM No. 16116/2009 ITA No. 1193/2009 & CM No. 16118/2009 ITA No. 1194/2009 & CM No. 16120/2009 ITA No. 1195/2009 & CM No. 16122/2009 ITA No. 1196/2009 & CM No. 16124/2009 ITA No. 1197/2009 & CM No. 16126/2009
ITA No. 1198/2009 & CM No. 16128/2009 ITA No. 1199/2009 & CM No. 16130/2009
Decided on: December 21, 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax
%
... Appellant
through:
Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Advocate
**VERSUS**
Sahara Airlines Ltd.
... Respondent
through:
Mr. Percy Pardiwala, Sr. Adv.
with Mr. U.A. Rana,
Ms. Anuradha Sharma and Ms. Priyanka Dayal, Advocates
CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTIC
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 195
- Subramanian Aravind, Tuticorin vs Ward 1, TuticorinITA 297/CHNY/2026[2018-2019]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2018-2019
- Gmp Technical Solutions Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, MumbaiITA 6155/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- M/S. Sarjak Container Lines Pvt Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT, Circle 3(1)(1), MumbaiITA 1791/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Universal Tractor Holding Llc, Usa vs DCIT, International Taxation Circle…ITA 2216/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Buttercup Publishing Private Limited, Delhi vs ITO Int Tax. 1(1)(2), DelhiITITA 19/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026