M/S. SARJAK CONTAINER LINES PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 3(1)(1), MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in shipping and project logistics, appealed against an assessment order concerning transfer pricing adjustments, denial of foreign tax credit, and disallowances under Section 40(a)(i) and for foreign exchange loss. The Tribunal admitted additional evidence filed by the assessee.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the transfer pricing adjustment and the disallowance under Section 40(a)(i), finding that the payments were not chargeable to tax in India. However, the grounds related to foreign tax credit and foreign exchange loss were dismissed.
What were the issues?
The key issues were whether transfer pricing adjustments for operational expense reimbursement were justified, whether foreign tax credit could be claimed as a business expenditure, and if payments to non-residents were subject to TDS under Section 195.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 144B,Section 92CA(1),Section 40(a)(i),Section 195,Section 90,Section 91,Section 37(1),Section 40(a)(ii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT & ANIKESH BANERJEE
PER: SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, (JM):
The instant appeal of the assessee filed against the order of the Ld. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department [for brevity “Ld. AO”], order passed under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity, ‘the Act’), date of order 12.12.2025. The impugned order originated by pursuing the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, (DRP- 1
ITA 1791/MUM/2026 M/S
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 3453/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6805/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Tbea Green Energy (India) Private Limited… vs ACIT, Central Circle 1, Vadodara, GujaratITA 592/AHD/2026[2022-2023]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
- At&T Communication Services India Private… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 5593/DEL/2024[AY 2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. S.G. Fab vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Nithil Agarwal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Navneet Singh vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Chief Secretary, Government Of JharkhandJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026