DLF LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NEW DELHI

ITA 674/DEL/2024Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 November 2024AY 2018-19Bench: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK (Judicial Member)19 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions related to revenue recognition and interest capitalization, finding them covered by previous ITAT decisions in the assessee's own case. For the issue of unverified/unreconciled ledger balances, the Tribunal found that the AO did not provide adequate opportunity and directed the matter to be remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee and revenue filed cross-appeals against the CIT(A)'s order. The revenue challenged the deletion of additions made by the AO concerning revenue recognition, interest capitalization, expenses related to exempted income, reclassification of income, and disallowance of helicopter/aircraft expenses. The assessee's appeal pertained to the upholding of additions related to unverified/unreconciled ledger balances.

What were the issues?

Whether the AO was justified in making additions on account of revenue recognition, interest capitalization, and unverified/unreconciled balances, and whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting or upholding these additions.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 14A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B”, NEW DELHI

For Respondent: Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Sr. DR
Hearing: 24.10.2024Pronounced: 06.11.2024

PER SHAMIM YAHYA, AM : The Assessee as well as Revenue has filed the cross appeals against the order of the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi relating to assessment year 2018-19. 2. We first deal with the Revenue’s appeal No. 712/Del/2024 (AY 2018-19) wherein, following grounds have been raised:-

1.

Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. NFAC has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 703,21,82,434/- made by the AO on account of disal

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 14A

All 15,875 judgments and leading authorities on Section 14A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →