ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE -1, LUDHIANA vs. M/S AARTI INTERNATIONAL LTD., LUDHIANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is eligible for interest under Section 244A only from the date the additional ground of appeal was filed before the CIT(A), as the delay prior to that was attributable to the assessee. The time taken by the CIT(A) to dispose of the appeal cannot be excluded.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed TUFS subsidy as a capital receipt for the first time in appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) allowed this claim and directed the AO to reduce the assessed income. The assessee then claimed interest under Section 244A on the refund, which was partially allowed by the AO.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is entitled to interest under Section 244A for the period before the additional ground of appeal was raised, and whether the delay in refund is attributable to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 244A,Section 244A(2),Section 154,Section 143(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(17)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Thana Electricity Supply Ltd.260 citing206 ITR 727 · 1994 · HC
- CIT v. Raja Benoy Kumar Sahas Roy132 citing32 ITR 466 · 1957 · SC
- Agarwal v. CIT113 citing189 ITR 769 · 1991 · HC
- CIT v. South Indian Bank Ltd.27 citing340 ITR 574 · 2012 · HC
- Bhopal Sugar Industries Ltd. v. ITO19 citing40 ITR 618 · 1960 · SC · Read judgment
- State of Andhra Pradesh v. Commercial Tax Officer19 citing169 ITR 564 · 1988 · HC
- CIT v. M.L. Sanghi15 citing203 ITR 54 · 1993 · HC
- (iv)CIT v. J.K. Jain15 citing230 ITR 839 · 1998 · HC
- Ajanta Manufacturing Ltd. v. Dy. CIT13 citing391 ITR 33 · 2017 · HC
- Air Conditioning Specialities (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India7 citing221 ITR 739 · 1996 · HC
- Concrete and Allied Products: 236 ITR 595 (CAL) and (ii) National Horticulture Board v. Union of India7 citing253 ITR 12 · 2002
- Taylor Investment Co. (India) Ltd. v. CIT7 citing232 ITR 771 · 1998 · HC
- Bhopal Sugar Industries Limited v. Income-tax Officer Bhopal5 citing1 SCR 474 · 1961
- CIT 232 ITR 771; CGT v Jain 230 ITR 839; CIT v Sunil Kumar 212 ITR 238; CIT v. Thana Elec5 citing202 ITR 1017 · 1993
- Ahmedabad Manufacturing and Calico Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax3 citing162 ITR 800 · 1986 · HC
- CIT v. G. Dalabhai & Co.3 citing226 ITR 922
- CIT v. Melstar Information Technology Ltd.3 citing265 Taxmann 50 · 2019 · HC
आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ “ए” , च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH
"ी सुधांशु "ीवा"तव, "या"यक सद"य, एवं "ी "व"म "संह यादव, लेखा सद"य BEFORE: SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA NO. 102/Chd/ 2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12
ACIT- Central Circle-1 M/s Aarti International Ltd. बनाम SCO 1-6, 2nd Floor Opp. G.T. Road, Milerganj, B.V.M. School, Kitchlu Nagar, Ludhiana – 141001, Punjab Ludhiana- 141001, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABCA4454C अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent
"नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Subhash Aggarwal, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Priyanka Dhar, Sr. DR
सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 26/09/2022 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 26/10/2022
आदेश/Order
PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. :
This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Ludhiana [in short the ‘Ld. CIT(A)’] passed u/s 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) dated 21/12/2021 pertaining to assessment year 2011-12, wherein the Revenue has taken the following grounds of appeal:
“1. Whether, in the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 244A
- Shailesh Khodabhai Ramani, Rajkot vs ITO, Ward-2(1)(3), RajkotITA 366/RJT/2024[2012-13]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Shailesh Khodabhai Ramani, Rajkot vs ITO, Ward-2(1)(5), RajkotITA 257/RJT/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 3453/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6805/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Pratibha Sanjai Srivastava, Ahmedabad vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2)(1), AhmedabadITA 2565/AHD/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2021-2022
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026