ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S MULLER INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CBDT circular has statutory force and instructs the Department not to press appeals where the tax effect is below the revised monetary limit. As the tax effect was below Rs. 20,00,000/-, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee contended that the appeal was not maintainable due to a CBDT circular revising the monetary limit for appeals to Rs. 20,00,000/-. The tax effect in this appeal was calculated to be less than this limit.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the Revenue's appeal before the ITAT in light of the CBDT's revised monetary limits for filing appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “Friday”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, HON’BLE & SHRI AMIT SHUKLA
O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA, J.M.
This is an appeal filed by the Revenue directed against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-39 New Delhi dated 30.11.2016 pertaining to the assessment year 2011-12.
During the course of hearing, the Ld. DR although supported the order of the AO, but could not controvert the fact that tax effect involved in this appeal is less than Rs. 20,00,000/-. The Ld. Counsel appearing for the assessee on the other hand contended that the present appeal of the Revenue is not maintainable in view of recent Circular of CBDT No. 3/2018 dated 11th July, 2018, whereby the monetary limit of tax effect for not filing appeals before the Tribunal has been revised to Rs. 20,00,000/-. He has given following working of tax on the disputed issue :-
Computation as per normal provisions: Income as per computation 4,13,751 Taxable Income under 4,13,751 normal provisions Calculation of Income u/s 115JB Book Profit as per computation 42,78,739 (“Declared) Addition in Book Profit (As Per 23,24,503 Revised Computation for wrongly claimed of Accumulated Losses) Assessed book profit 66,03,242 Tax @ 18% 11,88,584 Ed. Cess 3% 35,658 Total Tax on book profit 12,24,242
Having considered the rival submissions and the material available on record, including the above circular, we find that the above circular of CBDT on pecuniary limit has been issued in supersession of earlier CBDT Circular No. 21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015, revising the monetary limit of tax effect from Rs. 10,00,000/- to Rs. 20,00,000/-. These instructions of CBDT have now statutory force within the provisions of section 268A and are made applicable to the pending appeals also by virtue of para 13 of the Circular.
This Circular contains clear instructions to the Department to withdraw or not to press such appeals filed before the ITAT wherein tax effect involved does not exceed Rs. 20,00,000/-. It is not the case of the Revenue that the present appeal comes within the sweep of exclusion clauses as given in para No. 10 & 11 of the said Circular. Thus, going by the prescription of the afore-noted CBDT instructions, and without going into merits of the case, we dismiss the instant appeal filed by the Revenue, being not maintainable, as the tax effect involved in this appeal is less than Rs. 20.00 lacs.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed as indicated above.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 17th July, 2018.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026