SHREE JALARAM COOP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,VIRAMGAM vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(2)(1), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal ruled that the assessee was entitled to the Section 80P deduction for interest from fixed deposits with a co-operative bank. It further held that the adjustment under Section 143(1)(a)(v) for non-filing of ITR within the due date, being effective from April 1, 2021, was not applicable to Assessment Year 2019-20, rendering the CPC's disallowance illegal and without jurisdiction for this period.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a credit society, filed its income tax return for AY 2019-20 claiming a nil income after deducting Rs. 20,05,865/- under Section 80P. The CPC Bengaluru processed the return under Section 143(1), disallowing the deduction. This disallowance was upheld by a rectification order under Section 154 and subsequently by the CIT(A), leading to the present appeal.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the disallowance of deduction under Section 80P through an intimation under Section 143(1) was valid for Assessment Year 2019-20. 2. Whether the provisions of Section 143(1)(a)(v) regarding disallowance due to non-filing of ITR within the due date applied to Assessment Year 2019-20, considering its effective date.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80P,Section 143(1),Section 154,Section 143(1)(a)(v),Section 139(1),Section 80P(2)(a)(i)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- PCIT v. Ashwinkumar Arban Co-Operative Society Ltd.61 citing168 Taxmann.com 314 · 2024 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “SMC” BENCH
Before: Ms. Suchitra Kamble
This is an appeal filed against the order dated 29-09- 2025 passed by ADDL/JCIT(A)-3, Chennai for assessment year 2012-13. 2. The grounds of appeal are as under:- “1.1 The order u/s. 250 passed on 29.09.2025 by Addl./JCIT(A)-
Chennai [For short CIT(A)] upholding the prima facie adjustment by way of disallowance u/s 80P aggregating to Rs. 20,05,865/ made in order passed u/s 143(1) on 23.09.2020 by CPC Bengaluru is wholly illegal, unlawful and against the principles of natural justice.
2 The Ld.CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in not appreciating that the prima facie adjustment by way of disallowance u/s 80P aggregating to Rs. 20,05,865/- made in order passed u/s 143(1) on 23.09.2020 b
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026