KAUSHAL GANPATBHAI PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(INTL. TAXATION), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the deposit of salary earned outside India into an NRE account in India does not constitute 'receipt' of income in India as per Section 5(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, the salary income is not taxable in India.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a non-resident, received salary for services rendered outside India, which was deposited into his NRE account in India. The Assessing Officer treated this salary as taxable in India based on its receipt in India.
What were the issues?
Whether salary earned by a non-resident for services rendered outside India, and deposited into an NRE account in India, is taxable in India under Section 5(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Arvind Singh Chauhan v. ITO8 citing42 Taxmann.com 285 · 2014 · ITAT
- CIT v. AP Kalyanakrishnan8 citing195 ITR 534 · 1992 · HC
- 396 ITR 406 (Calcutta) 2. Director of Income-tax (International Taxation) v. Prahlad Vijendra Rao3 citing10 Taxmann.com 238 · 2011 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI SANJAY GARG & SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA
PER: ANNAPURNA GUPTA - AM: The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Assessing Officer in accordance with the direction of the Dispute Resolution Panel (“DRP”) under Section 147 r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) order dated 03.12.2024 and relates to Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2019-20. 2. The Grounds of Appeal raised by the assessee are as under:
“1. Ground No. 1 – Addition on account of alleged undisclosed salary income of Rs. 44,24,000:
On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned Assessing Officer ("AO")/Hon'ble Dispute
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 5(2)(a)
- DCIT International Taxation Noida, Noida vs Jai Gogia, NoidaITITA 36/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2026AY 2022-23
- Sachin Saxena, Bangalore vs DCIT/ADIT (International Taxation), NoidaITA 4037/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 May 2026AY 2017-18
- Siemens Mobility Gmbh, Germany vs Assistant Commissioner of Income…ITA 4713/MUM/2023[AY 2021-22]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2025
- Pritpal Singh Basan, Jharkhand vs Commissioner of Income Tax ( Appeal)…ITA 957/KOL/2024[2012-13]Status: Disposed26 Dec 2024AY 2012-13
- Pritpal Singh Basan, Jamshedpur vs Commissioner of Income Tax - Appeals…ITA 1003/KOL/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed26 Dec 2024AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026