PERFECT RETREADS PVT LTD,RAJKOT vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1(1), RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal heard the matter and accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The Department's representative had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) which upheld the disallowance of certain amounts by the Assessing Officer. During the hearing, the assessee's authorized representative requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is allowed to withdraw the appeal filed before the Tribunal. Whether the grounds of appeal raised against the disallowances by the lower authorities are to be adjudicated.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, AM. &
Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Hybrid Hearing) Perfect Retreads Pvt Ltd Vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1(1), Pushplaxmi, Gondal road, Vavdi, Rajkot 360001 Nr Rajkamal Petrol Pump. Gujrat 360004 �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AABCP2763P (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri G.R Sanghavi, Ld. AR Respondent by : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav , Ld. Sr. (DR) Date of Hearing : 04/03/2025 Date of Pronouncement : 04/03/2025 आदेश / O R D E R PER DINESH MOHAN SINHA JM;
Captioned appeal filed by assessee pertaining to Assessment Year 2013- 14, is directed against order passed by Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal), vide order dated 15/10/2024, which in turn arises out of an order passed by the Assessing Officer dated 13/03/2015 u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
GROUNDS OF APPEALS:- Ground No. 1. That the Ld. CIT(A) has grievously erred in confirming the disallowance of late payment of PF amounting to Rs. 4,38,934/-, Page | 1 Ground No.
2. That the Ld. CIT(A) has grievously erred in confirming the Ld. A.O's contention of adding the differential income of Rs. 27,82,150/- computed on the basis of difference between the TDS as per form 26AS and that claimed by the appellant in its return of income. Ground No.
3. That the Ld. CIT(A) has grievously erred in confirming the disallowance of the claim of Rs. 10,00,000 u/s 35AC. Ground No.
4. That the Ld. CIT(A) has grievously erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 10,61,770 u/s 14A. Ground No.
5. That the Ld. CIT(A) has grievously erred in confirming the Id A.O's contention of enhancing the valuation of closing stock by Rs. 21,57,220/-. Ground No.
6. That the Ld. CIT(A) has grievously erred in confirming the disallowance of discount of Rs. 14,11,454/-, Ground No.
That the appellant craves for leave to add, amend and/or modify the grounds of appeal.
During the course of hearing the Ld. AR of the assessee has moved an application for requesting to withdraw the appeal of the assessee. The application for withdraw of appeal runs as under. “That the appellant had preferred an application under DTVSV, 2024 as regards the above referred appeal. Copy of Form No. 2 as issued is attached herewith in substantiation of the same. The appellant would therefore sincerely appreciate if your Honours could grant leave to the appellant to withdraw the said appeal. ” That the Ld DR has to objection in case the assessee withdraw the appeal. We have heard the matter and accept the request of the Ld AR of the assessee. We permit to the assessee for withdraw the appeal. In result the appeal of the assessee is treated to be dismissed as withdraw.
More judgments on Section 35AC
- Ramanand Kidarnath International, Mumbai vs Dy. CIT, Circle 26(1), MumbaiITA 99/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed9 Jun 2026AY 2013-14
- Ramkrishna Bajaj Charitable Trust, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle…ITA 65/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed9 Jun 2026AY 2014-15
- Sushmita Kacholia, Mumbai vs DCIT, MumbaiITA 9443/MUM/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed5 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Mukut Behari Lal Bhargava, Gurgaon vs ACIT, Circle 3(1), GurgaonITA 2234/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed28 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
- Tulsi Trust, New Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, New DelhiITA 7217/DEL/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Dec 2025AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026