SRINIVASA REDDY YETURU,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessment order was barred by limitation as per Section 153 of the Income Tax Act. The period of exclusion for handing over seized materials was calculated, and it was found that the AO passed the order beyond the extended time limit.
What were the facts?
The assessee entered into an agreement to purchase agricultural land and paid Rs. 2,00,00,000/- in cash as 'on-money'. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of this amount as unexplained investment. The assessee also claimed deductions under sections 80D and 80EE, which were partially disallowed.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment order was barred by limitation, and whether the addition of unexplained investment and disallowance of deductions were justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153,Section 143(2),Section 69A,Section 80D,Section 80EE
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘B‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-Shri Manjunatha G.
Per MANJUNATHA, G. A.M. This appeal is filed by the assessee, which is directed against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), 11, Hyderabad, dated 01/10/2025, for the A.Y 2022-23. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
ITA No 1898 of 2025 Srinivasa Reddy Yeturu
“1. On the facts and circumstance of the case, Learned CIT(A) erred in passing the order both on law and facts.
On the facts and circumstance of the case, the Assessment Order
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3228/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Zabuben Mepabhai Bharvad, Ahmedabad vs The PCIT - 1, AhmedabadITA 1233/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 3453/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026