Section 80D of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 80D is CIT v. Surinder Pal Anand, Surinder Pal Anand (242 CTR 61), cited in 20 of the 43 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 80D

Judgments on Section 80D

RAJIV SHARMA,NEHRU PLACE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4356/DEL/2025[2023-2024]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jan 2026AY 2023-2024

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwalrajiv Sharma, Income Tax Officer, 307, Vishalbhawa, Nehru Place, Nafc, Delhi. Delhi-110019. Vs. Pan-Boaps6272K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Bhavesh Kumar, Ca Department By Shri Khitesh Gupta, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 27/11/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 27/11/2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [‘Cit(A)’ In Short], Dated 09.06.2025 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Arising Out Of Assessment Order Dated 12.03.2025 Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S 144B Of The It Act For Assessment Year 2023-24. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is An Individual & Filed His Return Of Income On 29.09.2025 Declaring Total Income Of Rs.53,62,490/-. The Assessee Is Engaged In The Business Of Sale & Purchase Of Computer Parts, Laptop & All Other Accessories Relating To Software & Hardware. The Case Of The Assessee Was Selected For Scrutiny Under Cass & The Assessment Was Completed By The Ao Wherein The Total Income Of The Assessee Was Computed At Rs.1,09,08,972/- By Making Rajiv Sharma Vs. Ito Disallowance @ 5% Out Of Total Purchase Of Rs.10,42,56,278/- & Further Disallowance @10% Out Of The Expenses Claimed At Rs.15,86,675/- Was Made As The Assesses Failed To Make Compliance Before The Ao & Further Failed To File Any Details.

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80C

Showing 120 of 43 · Page 1 of 3