SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal admitted additional evidence in the assessee's appeal concerning unexplained cash credits and remanded the issue to the AO for verification. The revenue's appeal concerning kitchen consumables and professional charges was dismissed, while the ground regarding job work expenses was upheld.
What were the facts?
The assessee company filed a return of income declaring NIL income. The Assessing Officer assessed the total income at Rs. 22,00,00,639/-. The assessee challenged this before the CIT(A), who granted partial relief. Both the assessee and revenue filed cross-appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the addition of unexplained cash credits (Rs. 13,45,60,000/-) against which additional evidence was sought to be admitted and remanded. The revenue also appealed against the deletion of additions related to kitchen consumables, professional charges, and job work expenses.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI MANJUNATHA G.
PER VIJAY PAL RAO, V.P. : These cross-appeals are directed against the Order dated 22.08.2025 of the learned CIT(A)-National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short “NFAC], Delhi, for the assessment year 2023-2024. 2 ITA.Nos.1779 & 1825/Hyd./2025
The assessee company filed its return of income for the year under consideration on 30.09.2023 declaring total income at Rs. NIL. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and accordingly, notice u/sec.143(2) of the Income Tax Act [in short "the Act"], 1961 was issued on 19.06.2024. The assessment was
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026