SAMIUDDIN ASLAM,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessment order was barred by limitation as per Section 153(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it was passed beyond the prescribed time limit from the date of notice. The extended time limit under Section 153(4) was not applicable as there was no reference to the TPO.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was selected for scrutiny under section 153C based on seized material from another company. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of Rs. 4,26,80,000/- for unexplained investment in commercial property, alleging cash payment beyond banking channels.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessment order passed under Section 153C r.w.s. 144C was barred by limitation. Another issue was the applicability of Section 69 to NRIs.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153C,Section 144C,Section 153B,Section 69,Section 153(2),Section 153(4)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘B‘Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice- & Shri Manjunatha G.
These four appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the separate assessment orders passed by the A. O under section 153C r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, all dated 17/01/2025, for the Assessment. Years 2016-17 to 2019- 20 respectively. The assessee has raised similar grounds for all the four Assessment Years. Therefore, for the sake of convenience, these appeals were heard togeth
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026