DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. G.K. DAIRY AND MILK PRODUCTS (P) LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that as per CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018, the Revenue should not file appeals where the tax effect does not exceed Rs. 20 lakhs. This instruction applies retrospectively to pending appeals.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed several departmental appeals before the ITAT. The tax effect in these appeals was less than Rs. 20 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether departmental appeals with a tax effect below the prescribed monetary limit are maintainable before the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “C” : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
Heard together (6 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
This Order shall dispose off the above Departmental Appeals filed by the Revenue.
We have heard the Learned D.R. and Learned Counsel for the Assessees whosoever have appeared in their respective cases.
The above matters have been preponed for hearing. Notice is given to both parties on Notice Board.
Admittedly, the tax effect in the Departmental Appeals are less than Rs.20 lakhs. Vide Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by CBDT under section 268A of the I.T. Act, it has been directed that Department shall not file appeal before the Tribunal in case where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.20 lakhs. It is also directed that this instruction will apply retrospectively to the pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in the Tribunal. Pending appeals below the specified tax effect may be withdrawn/not pressed. Learned Sr. D.R. in view of the above Board Circular did not press the Departmental Appeals. We may also note that the Appeals of the Department above would not fall within the exceptions provided in the Board Circular. In the result, all the Departmental Appeals are not maintainable as have been filed against the instruction of the Board. All Departmental Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed by the Learned Sr. D.R.
Copy of the Order be placed in each file.
Order pronounced in the open court on 13/8/2018
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026