RMKV FASHION GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMTIED,TIRUNELVELI vs. DCIT CRICLE-1, TIRUNELEVLI, TIRUNELVELI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO issued the notice under section 148 after the specified time limit of 30.06.2021, and therefore, approval should have been obtained from the Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director General as per clause (ii) of section 151. Since the approval was obtained from the Principal Commissioner (clause (i)), it was not valid. The assumption of jurisdiction by the AO to issue the re-assessment notice under section 148 was deemed bad in law.
What were the facts?
The assessee is challenging the validity of the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The primary contention is that the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to obtain prior approval from the competent authority as required by Section 151 of the Act, especially given that the notice was issued beyond the three-year period from the end of the assessment year.
What were the issues?
Whether the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is valid without obtaining prior approval from the specified competent authority as per Section 151 of the Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal713 citing167 Taxmann.com 70 · 2024 · SC · Read judgment
- Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal524 citing444 ITR 1 · 2022 · SC · Read judgment
- Core Logistic Company v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax26 citing175 Taxmann.com 453 · 2025 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & MS. PADMAVATHY S
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: These are Stay application and appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter referred to as “the Ld.CIT(A)”), Delhi, dated & SA 31/Chny/2026 RMKV Fashion Garment Pvt. Ltd, (Now merged with RMKV Fabrics Pvt.Ltd,) 11.12.2025 for
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026