Section 3(1) of the Income Tax Act

28 judgments on BharatTax turn on Section 3(1).

Judgments on Section 3(1)

KANTI PRASAD FINVEST PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. WARD 14(1), DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2928/DEL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms Madhumita Roy & Smt. Renu Jauhri

For Appellant: Shri Piyush Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Chandra Bhanu Mandal, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250

RMKV FASHION GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMTIED,TIRUNELVELI vs. DCIT CRICLE-1, TIRUNELEVLI, TIRUNELVELI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed & Stay Petition

ITA 394/CHNY/2026[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Ms. Padmavathy Sआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.394/Chny/2026 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 & Stay Petition No.31/Chny/2026 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 V. Rmkv Fashion Garment Pvt. Ltd, The Dcit Circle – 1, (Now Merged With Rmkv Fabrics Pvt. Tirunelveli. Ltd,) 176F Trivandrum Road, Vannarpettai, Tirunelveli – 627 003. [Pan: Aafcr 4023 G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Mr. G. Baskar, Advocate & P.M. Kathir, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Mr. Bipin C.N, Cit

For Appellant: Mr. G. Baskar, Advocate &For Respondent: Mr. Bipin C.N, CIT
Section 148Section 148ASection 151

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI vs. SURBHI JEWELLERS PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by revenue stands dismissed

ITA 5447/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Shri Jagadish ()

Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 68

VASAVI CLUB,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-11(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 994/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad19 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 115TSection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 249(2)Section 249(3)

AAMIR KHATRI ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT-17(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal ITA No

ITA 3586/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Dec 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Prabhash Shankar

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 263

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-14(3), NEW DELHI vs. KOLAHAI INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED , NEW DELHI

In the result the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3399/DEL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Nov 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sudhir Kumar & Shri Manish Agarwalassessment Year: 2015-16 Income Tax Officer, Vs. Kolahai, Infotech Private Limited Ward-14(3) , Room 129, First Floor Transport Centre No.305 Cr Building I.P. Punjabi Bagh New Delhi, Delhi- Estate New Delhi -110002 110034

Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)Section 14ASection 68

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW vs. SUDHANSHU TRIVEDI, LUCKNOW

ITA 418/LKW/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudharyassessment Year: 2015-16 The Acit V. Sudhanshu Trivedi Lucknow 21/1013, Sector 21 Indira Nagar, Lucknow (U.P) Tan/Pan:Ackpt4164G (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Amit Singh Chouhan, D.R. Respondent By: S/Shri Rajat Jain & Akshat Jain, Cas O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Amit Singh Chouhan, D.RFor Respondent: S/Shri Rajat Jain and Akshat Jain, CAs
Section 10(38)Section 115BSection 143(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 149Section 271(1)(c)

SANGEETA KHANDELWAL,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 28 (1), DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, Appeals of the Assessee are allowed

ITA 2495/DEL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Naveen Chandra

Section 148Section 148ASection 149Section 149(1)

ITO, WARD-10(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. ALEX TRADECOM PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2197/KOL/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyita Nos.2197 & 2198/Kol/2024 Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15 Ito, Ward-10(2), Kolkata…………..…………………………….…….……Appellant Vs. Alex Tradecom Pvt. Ltd…………..……………….………...……...…..…..Respondent 4, Ratan Sarkar Garden Street, Burrabazar, Kol- 700069. [Pan: Aajca6146P] Appearances By: Smt. Madhumita Das, Addl. Cit, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Akshay Ringasia, Ca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : October 15, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : October 27, 2025 Order Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: Both The Captioned Appeals Have Been Preferred By The Revenue For The Assessment Years 2013-14 & 2014-15 Against Separate Orders Dated 05.08.2024 & 26.07.2024 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’) Respectively. Since, The Issues Involved In Both The Appeals Are Common & Relate To The Same Assessee, Therefore, These Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Consolidated Order. 2. Both The Appeals Have Been Filed By The Revenue With Delays Of 38 Days. The Revenue Has Filed Separate Affidavits For Condonation Of The Delays. After Considering The Reasons Cited In The Affidavits For Condonation Of Delay, We Find That The Reasons Are Valid And

Section 148Section 148ASection 250

AGGARWAL ABHUSHAN PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(1),DELHI/NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 712/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sudhir Kumaraggarwal Abhushan Vs. Dcit Circle-1(1), Delhi/ Private Limited, National Faceless Appeal B-5/153, Sector-7, Centre, Delhi-110002 Rohini, Delhi-110085

For Appellant: Ms. Meenal Goyal, Adv. &For Respondent: Shri Om Prakash, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149

TUFFWUD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the filed by is allowed in above terms

ITA 571/BANG/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Soundararajan Kassessment Year: 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Muthu Shankar, CIT (DR)
Section 148Section 151Section 153CSection 234ASection 250Section 68Section 69C

URVASHI SAREES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 11(1), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and the appeal of Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1946/KOL/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata24 Jul 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: ITAT, Kolkata were collected and prepared | | 18.01.2025 | 2nd Appeal was filed |

Section 143(2)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250Section 69C

ITO-19.3.1, MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. SHEELA MADHAV APTE, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 3079/MUM/2024[2019]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya, Hon’Ble & Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil Rungta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kanti Datta, CIT, D/R
Section 2(11)Section 3(1)

DCIR CC 2(3), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. SHREE SALASAR MARBLES IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED, MMUMBAI

ITA 3721/MUM/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Jul 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala, CAFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kanti Datta, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 68Section 69C

ACIT, ANAND CIRCLE, ANAND, ANAND vs. NATIONAL DAIRY DEVELOPMENT BOARD, ANAND

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 738/AHD/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: DR. BRR Kumar (Vice President), Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 35DSection 36(1)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 37(1)

AJAY MULTI PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 4(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2675/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, () & Shri Prabhash Shankar, ()

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 234ASection 250Section 271ASection 68

ACIT-CC-7(3), MUMBAI vs. LOTUS LOGISTICS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed whereas cross-objection of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 627/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2017-18 Acit-Cc-7(3) Lotus Logistics & Developers Room No. 655, Floor 6Th, Private Limited Aayakar Bhavan, M.K.Road, Vs. 1301, 13Th Level, Lotus Trade Mumbai-400020 Centre, New Link Road, Near D N Nagar Metro Station, Andheri-West, Mumbai- 700013 Pan No. Aabcl 1198 G Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Rushabh MehtaFor Respondent: DR. K. R. Subhash, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 43C

INCOME TAX OFFICER, MUMBAI vs. UTTAMCHAND RAJMAL JAIN , MUMBAI

In the result the cross objection filed by the assessee stands allowed in terms of grounds 2, 5 and 7 and the appeal filed by the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 4714/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Smt. Renu Jauhri ()

Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 69A

INCOME TAX OFFICER 23 3 6, PIRAMAL CHAMBERS vs. RAHUL HARIPRASAD TIBREWAL, MUMBAI

ITA 430/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SMT RENU JAUHRI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Dharmesh ShahFor Respondent: Shri R. R. Makwana
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250

DCIT-CC(5), MUMBAI vs. LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, for A.Y. 2015-16, appeal by the revenue is dismissed and cross objection by the assessee is allowed

ITA 5745/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri J.D. Mistry, Sr. Advocate and Shri Ronak Joshi, CAFor Respondent: Dr. K.R. Subhash, CIT DR and Shri Ram Krishn Kedia, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148

Showing 1–20 of 28 · Page 1 of 2