DCIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD vs. MATA JHANDEWALAN EDUCATIONAL WELFARE SOCIETY, AGRA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the departmental appeal was not maintainable as it was filed against the CBDT's instructions. The Senior DR did not press the appeal in view of the circular.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs. 20 lakhs. The CBDT had issued a circular directing that appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 20 lakhs should not be filed or pressed.
What were the issues?
Whether a departmental appeal with a tax effect below the monetary limit specified in a CBDT circular is maintainable before the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA
ITA No:-1656/Del/2018 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax M/s. Mata Jhandewalan Exemption, Circle, Ghaziabad Vs. Educational Welfare Society C/o Dr. MPS Memorial College of Business Studies, Near Naveen Sabzi Mandi, NH-2, Sikandra, Agra APPELLANT RESPONDENT Revenue by : Sh. Anil Kumar Sharma, Sr. DR Assessee by : None Date of Hearing : 06.09.2018. Date of Pronouncement : 07.09.2018. ORDER PER: N. K. BILLAIYA, AM This appeal by the Revenue has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-2 , Agra, dated 30.11.2017 for Assessment Year 2014-15.
Admittedly, the tax effect in the Departmental Appeal is less than Rs.20 lakhs. Vide Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by CBDT under section 268A of the I.T. Act, it has been directed that Department shall not file appeal before the Tribunal in case where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.20 lakhs. It is also directed that this instruction will apply retrospectively to the pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in the Tribunal. Pending appeals below the specified tax effect may be withdrawn/not pressed. Learned Sr. D.R. in view of the above Board Circular did not press the Departmental Appeal. We may also note that the Appeal of the Department above would not fall within the exceptions provided in the Board Circular. In the result, the Departmental Appeal is not maintainable as have been filed against the instruction of the Board. The Departmental Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed by the Learned Sr. D.R.
In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 07.09.2018.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026