ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. SHRI SURESH VASWANI, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5903/DEL/2015Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 September 2018AY 2012-134 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable due to a low tax effect, as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 which sets a monetary limit for filing appeals. The appeal was dismissed as infructuous.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A). The appeal was filed for the assessment year 2012-13. The Revenue conceded that the appeal had a low tax effect.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable when the tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars, and whether such circulars have retrospective effect.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 268A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’ : NEW DELHI

Before: HON’BLE, SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL & SHRI KULDIP SINGH

For Respondent: Shri Janardan Dass, Senior DR
Hearing: 10.09.2018

ASSESSEE BY : None REVENUE BY : Shri Janardan Dass, Senior DR Date of Hearing : 10.09.2018 Date of Order : 10.09.2018

O R D E R PER KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER :

The appellant, ACIT, Circle 50 (1), New Delhi, by filing the present appeal, sought to set aside the impugned order dated 17.08.2015 passed by Ld. CIT (A)-17, New Delhi qua the assessment year 2012-13.

2.

Perusal of the aforesaid appeal filed by the Revenue apparently show that the same is having low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11th July, 2018 vide which the Revenue has been directed not to prefer any appeal in case the tax effect is less than Rs.20,00,000/- and this factual position has been fairly conceded by the Ld. DR.

3.

We have heard the ld. DR on the issue in controversy and perused the material on record. Perusal of CBDT Circular (supra) shows that monetary limit for filing the appeal by the Department before the Tribunal, Hon'ble High Court and Hon'ble Supreme Court has been revised and the relevant portion of the aforesaid circular is extracted as under:

“Subject: Revision of monetary limits for filing of appeals by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLPs/appeals before Supreme Court-measures for reducing litigation- Reg. Reference is invited to Board’s Circular No. 21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015 wherein monetary limits and other conditions for filing departmental appeals (in Income-tax matters) before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, High Courts and SLPs/ appeals before Supreme Court were specified.

2. In supersession of the above Circular, it has been decided by the Board that departmental appeals may be filed on merits before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and High Courts and SLPs/ appeals before Supreme Court keeping in view the monetary limits and conditions specified below.

3. Henceforth, appeals/ SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder:

Monetary S. No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax Limit (in matters Rs) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 20,00,000/- 2 Before High Court 50,00,000/- 3 Before Supreme Court 1,00,00,000/- It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. …… 12. It is clarified that the monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakhs for filing appeals before the ITAT would apply equally to cross objections under section 253(4) of the Act. Cross objections below this monetary limit, already filed, should be pursued for dismissal as withdrawn/ not pressed. Filing of cross objections below the monetary limit may not be considered henceforth. Similarly, references to High Courts and SLPs/ appeals before Supreme Court below the monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakhs and Rs. 1 Crore respectively should be pursued for dismissal as withdrawn/ not pressed. References before High Court and SLPs/ appeals below these limits may not be considered henceforth.

13.

This Circular will apply to SLPs/ appeals/ cross objections/ references to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal and it shall also apply retrospectively to pending SLPs/ appeals/ cross objections/references. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in pare 3 above may be withdrawn/ not pressed.

14.

The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.

15.

This issues under Section 268A of the Income-tax Act 1961……”

5.

In view of the CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 having retrospective effect and what has been discussed above, we are of the considered view that the aforesaid appeal is not maintainable because of low tax effect i.e. less than Rs.20,00,000/- hence, the aforesaid appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed having been become infructuous. However, in case, the present appeal is found to be covered by the revised guidelines issued by the CBDT vide letter F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt) dated 20th August, 2018, the Department shall be at liberty to seek recall of this order under relevant provisions of law. Order pronounced in open court on this 10th day of September, 2018 after the conclusion of the hearing.

More judgments on Section 268A

All 3,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 268A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →