SHREE CHALALA VI KA SEVA SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD. ,AMRELI vs. THE ITO WARD 3(1)(4), RAJKOT-AMRELI., RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax had granted condonation of delay in filing the return. Since the delay was condoned and the issue of late filing was resolved, the disallowance of deduction under Section 80P based on the late filing was no longer tenable.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative society, filed its return for AY 2019-20 on 30.11.2020, claiming deductions under Section 80P. The CPC disallowed the deduction stating the return was filed late. The assessee clarified that the return was filed under Section 139(4), and the CPC's action was not a prima facie adjustment. Subsequently, the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax granted condonation of delay for filing the return.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of deduction under Section 80P by CPC was justified when the return was filed belatedly but the delay was subsequently condoned by the Chief Commissioner.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(1),Section 143(1)(a)(v),Section 80P,Section 139(1),Section 139(4),Section 80P(2)(a)(i),Section 80P(2)(a)(iv),Section 80P(2)(d),Section 80AC,Section 119(2)(b)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, A CCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA
Per, Dinesh Mohan Sinha, JM; Captioned appeal filed by assessee pertaining to Assessment Year 2019-20, is directed against order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), dated 31/03/2025, which in turn arises out of an order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(1) of the Act.
The Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as follows: -
The learned ADDL/JCIT (A)-1, Kolkata erred in confirming action of CPC, Bangalore in disallowing claim of dedu
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026