TE CONNECTIVITY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. THE OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 7(1)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, following a coordinate bench's decision, held that the remeasurement gain on defined employee benefit plan should be treated as operating. The issue of foreign exchange loss was not pressed by the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee treated remeasurement gain on defined employee benefit plan as operating and foreign exchange loss as non-operating. The TPO disagreed, treating the gain as non-operating and the loss as operating. The DRP confirmed the TPO's action.
What were the issues?
Whether remeasurement gain on defined employee benefit plan is operating or non-operating for transfer pricing purposes.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. EKL Appliances Ltd.422 citing345 ITR 241 · 2012 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Patni Computer Systems Ltd.92 citing215 Taxmann 108 · 2013 · HC
- AMD India Pvt Ltd. v. DCIT3 citing95 Taxmann.com 531
- DCIT v. Hewlett Packard India Software Operations Private Limited3 citing149 Taxmann.com 280 · 2022 · ITAT
- PCIT v. AMD India Pvt Ltd.3 citing98 Taxmann.com 512
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K
PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the assessment order passed by the AO vide order date 26.07.2024 having DIN ITBA/AST/S143(3)/2024-25/1067079032(1) for the AY 2020-21 pursuant to DRP-2, Bengaluru order dt. 11.06.2024. 2. The Assessee before us has filed revised grounds of appeal vide letter dated 5th March 2025. Through the revised grounds of appeal, the IT(TP)A No.1789/Bang/2024 assessee has raised multiple grounds and sub-grounds under the main ground which are numbered as Ground Nos. 1 to 21. 3. The issues raised by the assessee
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- M/S. Avl India Private Limited, New Delhi vs DCIT, New DelhiDelhi7 Nov 2017Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. Patni Computer Systems Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that interest on receivables arising from delays in payment by AEs constitutes an international transaction. It also emphasized the preference for internal comparable uncontrolled transactions (CUPs) fo...
- M/S Erm India P Ltd., New Delhi vs Neac, New DelhiDelhi28 Sept 2021Partly Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. Patni Computer Systems Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that if working capital adjustment is made, it subsumes the interest on receivables, and no separate benchmarking is required. The addition made on account of interest on receivables could not be sustai...
- Te Connectivity India Private Limited… vs The Office of the Deputy Commissioner of…Bangalore10 Oct 2025Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. Patni Computer Systems Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that the disallowance was unjustified as the assessee had provided primary evidence like invoices and ledger details, and the AO failed to utilize his powers under Section 133(6) to verify from supplier...
- Thomas Cook (India) Ltd., Mumbai vs Addl/ Jt/ Dy/CIT/Asstt/ITO, National…Mumbai24 Nov 2023Partly Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. EKL Appliances Ltd.
The Tribunal held that the amount of profit eligible under Section 10(38) should be considered for tax liability under Section 115JB, allowing the benefit of indexation for long-term capital gains. Other grounds were dec...
- Zeta Interactive Systems (India) Private… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-17(4), HyderabadHyderabad7 Jun 2022Partly Allowed
Also relies on CIT v. EKL Appliances Ltd.
The Tribunal held that the delay in receiving payments from AEs constitutes an international transaction requiring benchmarking. Several judgments relied upon by the assessee were found not applicable to the facts of the...
More judgments on Section 92C
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 3453/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6805/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Tbea Green Energy (India) Private Limited… vs ACIT, Central Circle 1, Vadodara, GujaratITA 592/AHD/2026[2022-2023]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
- Styrenix Performance Materials Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1066/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Styrenix Performance Materials Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1066/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026