TATA STEEL BSL LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS BHUSHAN STEEL LTD.),NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 3, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had approved a resolution plan and granted a moratorium. Relying on Supreme Court decisions regarding the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), the Tribunal decided to remand the appeals to the Assessing Officer to take necessary steps as per Section 156A of the Act.
What were the facts?
The appeals by both the Revenue and the assessee were filed against the orders of the CIT(A) for Assessment Years 2014-15 and 2015-16. The assessee's counsel submitted that a Co-ordinate Bench had granted relief in quantum appeals, restoring the matter to the Assessing Officer.
What were the issues?
Whether proceedings can continue when an NCLT resolution plan is approved and a moratorium is in place, and the necessity of remanding the matter to the AO under Section 156A of the Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction192 citing126 Taxmann.com 132 · 2021 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES ‘F’ DELHI
आदेश क' /ितिल0प अ1े0षत आदेश क' /ितिल0प अ1े0षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : आदेश क' /ितिल0प अ1े0षत आदेश क' /ितिल0प अ1े0षत 1. अपीलाथ3 / The Appellant 2. /4यथ3 / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आयु5(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 4. आयकर आयु5 / CIT 5. 0वभागीय /ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, �द�ली / DR, ITAT, Delhi, 6. गाड" फाईल / Guard file.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- DCIT, Central Circle-3, New Delhi vs Tata Steel Bsl Ltd (Formerly Known As…Delhi17 Jan 2025Remanded
Also relies on Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction
The Tribunal noted that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had approved a resolution plan and granted a moratorium. Relying on Supreme Court decisions regarding the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), the Tribuna...
- Universal Industrial Equipment and… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…Nagpur17 Feb 2026Allowed
Also relies on Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction
The Tribunal held that claims not forming part of an approved resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) are extinguished. Since the Income Tax Department failed to submit its claim, the existing tax ...
- Universal Industrial Equipment and… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…Nagpur17 Feb 2026Allowed
Also relies on Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction
The Tribunal held that once a resolution plan is approved, all claims not part of the plan are extinguished. Since the Income Tax Department did not file a claim, the tax liabilities for the assessment years in question ...
- Ramanagaram Enterprises Private Limited… vs ACIT., Circle-16(1), HyderabadHyderabad7 Nov 2025Allowed
Also relies on Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction
The Tribunal ruled that once an NCLT-approved resolution plan under Section 31(1) of IBC, 2016, becomes binding, all pre-CIRP claims, including those of the Income Tax Department, are frozen and must be given effect as p...
- Manz Retails P Ltd. (Now Amalgamated With… vs DCIT Range 10 (2)92), MumbaiMumbai18 Oct 2024Partly Allowed
Also relies on Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction
The Tribunal referred to Section 14 of the IBC, which prohibits suits and proceedings against a corporate debtor during a moratorium. Considering the newly inserted Section 156A of the Income Tax Act, the Tribunal found ...
More judgments on Section 156A
- ACIT-15(3)(1), Mumbai vs Reliance Capital Limited, MumbaiITA 6490/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- ACIT-15(3)(1), Mumbai vs Reliance Capital Limited, MumbaiITA 6489/MUM/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- ACIT-15(3)(1), Mumbai vs Reliance Capital, MumbaiITA 6355/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- ACIT-15(3)(1), Mumbai vs Reliance Capital Limited, MumbaiITA 6283/MUM/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- ACIT-15(3)(1), Mumbai vs Reliance Capital Limited, MumbaiITA 6067/MUM/2026[2016]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026