UNIVERSAL INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT AND TECHNICAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. ,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2 , NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that once a resolution plan is approved, all claims not part of the plan are extinguished. Since the Income Tax Department did not file a claim, the tax liabilities for the assessment years in question stood abated.
What were the facts?
The assessee company underwent Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Income Tax Department did not file any claim with the resolution professional. The resolution plan was approved by the NCLT, and subsequently, the assessee filed appeals against tax demands.
What were the issues?
Whether tax liabilities not included in an approved resolution plan are extinguished. Whether the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code overrides the Income Tax Act in such cases.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction192 citing126 Taxmann.com 132 · 2021 · SC
- Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. v. Union of India5 citing135 Taxmann.com 188 · 2022 · HC · Read judgment
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “NAGPUR” BENCH, NAGPUR BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI KHETTRA MOHAN ROY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Physical hearing) Universal Industrial Equipment And DCIT, Circle – 2, Nagpur Maharashtra – 440001. Maharashtra – 440001. [PAN: AAACU3536C] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee by Miss. Veena Agrawal, CA Revenue by Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Sr. DR Date of hearing 17.02.2026 Date of pronouncement 17.02.2026 Order under section 254(1) of Income Tax Act
PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These two appeals by assessee are directed against the separate orders of ld. CIT(A)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, both dated 27.04.2023 for Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2014–15 & 2015–16. In both the appeals the assessee has raised similar grounds of appeal, raising the plea that the assessee has gone under Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and the claim of Income Tax department was not part of resolution plan approved
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 156A
- ACIT-15(3)(1), Mumbai vs Reliance Capital Limited, MumbaiITA 6490/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- ACIT-15(3)(1), Mumbai vs Reliance Capital Limited, MumbaiITA 6489/MUM/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- ACIT-15(3)(1), Mumbai vs Reliance Capital, MumbaiITA 6355/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- ACIT-15(3)(1), Mumbai vs Reliance Capital Limited, MumbaiITA 6283/MUM/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- ACIT-15(3)(1), Mumbai vs Reliance Capital Limited, MumbaiITA 6067/MUM/2026[2016]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026