KAISHAR INTERIORS PRIVATE LIMTIED ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 4(2)(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the Section 14A disallowance based on correct figures for interest expenses and total assets. It also deleted the disallowance of motor car expenses, depreciation, and interest on car loan, finding that the cars were registered in the company's name and there was no basis for ad-hoc disallowance.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Kaishar Interiors Private Limited, was subjected to reassessment proceedings for AY 2010-2011 based on information about alleged bogus purchases. The Assessing Officer made additions for bogus purchases, Section 14A disallowance, and motor car expenses.
What were the issues?
The validity of reassessment proceedings and the correctness of additions made for bogus purchases, Section 14A disallowance, and motor car expenses.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. v. ITO862 citing236 ITR 34 · 1999 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” BENCH, MUMBAI
[ Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member:
The present appeal preferred by the Assessee is directed against the order, dated 03/07/2025, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘the CIT(A)’] whereby the Ld. CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal against the Assessment Order, dated 26/03/2016, passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2010-2011. Assessment Year 2010-2011
The Assessee has raise
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026