BANK OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. THE NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed Ground No. 6 of the assessee's appeal, which pertained to the invocation of Section 115JB. Consequently, grounds related to book profit computation were rendered infructuous. The Revenue's grounds concerning Section 14A were dismissed as academic, and other grounds were either not adjudicated or dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Bank of India, and the Revenue filed cross-appeals against the CIT(A)'s order concerning assessment years 2016-17 and 2018-19. The appeals involved several grounds, including disallowances under Section 14A, amortization of lease premium, exclusion of foreign branch profits, and provisions for country risk and bad debts.
What were the issues?
Key issues included the applicability of Section 14A for disallowance of expenses related to exempt income, the treatment of lease premium, the exclusion of foreign branch profits under DTAA, and the computation of book profit under Section 115JB.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14A,Section 115JB,Section 90,Section 91,Section 32,Section 37(1),Section 43D
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT1,596 citing91 Taxmann.com 154 · 2018 · SC · Read judgment
- South Indian Bank Ltd. v. CIT508 citing438 ITR 1 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
- Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. v. CIT326 citing343 ITR 270 · 2012 · SC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. State Bank of Patiala228 citing391 ITR 218 · 2017 · HC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. State Bank of Patiala170 citing245 Taxmann 273 · 2018
- Pepsu Road Transport Corporation v. CIT28 citing130 ITR 18 · 1981 · HC
- PCIT v. Punjab National Bank21 citing140 Taxmann.com 131 · 2022 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “I” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAVSHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER BENCH : The present cross-appeals have been filed by the assessee and the Revenue challenging the separate impugned ord
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026