INDORIGIN ELECTRIC LTD,WADALA MUMBAI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 4 4 MUMBAI , MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal directed the AO to restrict the disallowance under Section 14A to the amount of exempt income, following a High Court decision. Regarding capital gains, the Tribunal restored the issue to the AO for de novo adjudication after examining the submitted documents, setting aside the impugned order on this ground.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in manufacturing and trading of industrial and electrical products, filed its return declaring income. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, which was upheld by the CIT(A). For capital gains, the AO disallowed certain expenses claimed as cost of improvement, which was partly allowed by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Disallowance of expenses under Section 14A and computation of long-term capital gains.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14A,Section 10(34),Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 143(3),Section 55
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAVSHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL
PER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, J.M. The assessee has filed the present appeal against the impugned order dated 30/05/2025, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) by the learned Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Visakhapatnam, [“learned Addl./Joint CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2014-15. 2. Ground No.1, raised in the assessee’s appeal, pertains to the disallowance under section 14A of the Act. 2
The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in the manufacturing and trading of industrial and electrical products. For
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026